Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

IWMY vs RDTE: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year RDTE paid 34.6% of its price in cash against IWMY’s 29.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF and Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

29.9%IWMY cash paid, 1 year
34.6%RDTE cash paid, 1 year
+6.3%IWMY total return, 1 year
+16.6%RDTE total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: RDTE scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

IWMY 19.4RDTE 40.93.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

IWMY10.9 pts behind IWM · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IWM+17.2%IWMY+6.3%29.9% of it arrived as cash10.9 pts behind IWMTotal return, distributions reinvestedIWM+17.2%IWMY+6.3%10.9 pts behind IWM
RDTE0.6 pts behind IWM · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IWM+17.2%RDTE+16.6%34.6% of it arrived as cash0.6 pts behind IWMTotal return, distributions reinvestedIWM+17.2%RDTE+16.6%34.6% as cash0.6 pts behind IWM

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWMY and RDTE hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWMY and RDTE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWMYRDTE
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20312.71%2.99%
Only in each
Only in IWMYOnly in RDTE
Rut 12/18/2026 200.34 C 92.47%RUT 03/19/2027 252.3 C 48.10%
Cash & Other 4.95%4RUT US 12/18/26 C246.2 FLX 43.12%
Rut 09/21/2026 2868.98 C 0.22%Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 5.78%
Rut 09/21/2026 2860.4 C -0.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

IWMY and RDTE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
IWMYRDTEIWMYRDTEIWMYRDTE
3 months−3.9%−0.1%7.2%8.2%−0.3 pts+3.5 pts
6 months+14.5%+18.7%16.1%18.3%−3.4 pts+0.8 pts
1 year+6.3%+16.6%29.9%34.6%−10.9 pts−0.6 pts
Since launch+41.5%+39.2%91.8%62.4%−37.1 pts−0.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
IWMY and RDTE on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF
Option income on IWM, paying weekly
RDTE
Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on IWM, paying weekly
IssuerDefianceRoundhill
Strategyoption income0DTE covered call
BenchmarkRussell 2000 (IWM)Russell 2000 (IWM)
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized30.2%20.9%
Expense ratio1.05%0.97%
Cash paid, 1 year29.9%34.6%
Price change, 1 year−24.9%−21.4%
Total return, 1 year+6.3%+16.6%
Benchmark return, 1 year+17.2%+17.2%
Ahead or behind−10.9 pts−0.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate0%not published
Age1053 days738 days
Net assets$90m$181m

IWMY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IWMY paid 29.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 24.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.3%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +17.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.2%, paid weekly. Defiance estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

RDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, RDTE paid 34.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.6%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +17.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.9%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, IWMY or RDTE?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IWMY paid 29.9% of its starting price in cash and RDTE paid 34.6%, so RDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, IWMY or RDTE?
With every distribution reinvested, IWMY returned +6.3% and RDTE returned +16.6% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so RDTE returned more.
Which is cheaper, IWMY or RDTE?
IWMY charges 1.05% a year and RDTE charges 0.97%, so RDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWMY against RDTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWMY against RDTE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iwmy-vs-rdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources