Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

RDTE vs RDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RDTY paid 35.2% of its price in cash against RDTE’s 33.9% and the two finished level on total return.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about RDTE and RDTY

Net assets: $156m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, and $15m on Nov 3, 2026 for YieldMax R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

At a glance
33.9%
RDTE cash paid, 1 year
35.2%
RDTY cash paid, 1 year
+18.7%
RDTE total return, 1 year
+18.8%
RDTY total return, 1 year
RDTE · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 About even with IWM
RDTE
+18.7%
IWM
+19.0%

About even with IWM

RDTE over 1 year: paid 33.9%, price −18.5%, total +18.7%, IWM +19.0%, −0.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

RDTE

+18.7%

33.9% of it arrived as cash

about even with IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with IWM

RDTE over 1 year: paid 33.9%, price −18.5%, total +18.7%, IWM +19.0%, −0.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

RDTE

+18.7%

33.9% as cash

about even with IWM

33.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. RDTE over 1 year: paid 33.9%, price −18.5%, total +18.7%, IWM +19.0%, −0.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
RDTY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 About even with IWM
RDTY
+18.8%
IWM
+19.0%

About even with IWM

RDTY over 1 year: paid 35.2%, price −19.8%, total +18.8%, IWM +19.0%, −0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

RDTY

+18.8%

35.2% of it arrived as cash

about even with IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with IWM

RDTY over 1 year: paid 35.2%, price −19.8%, total +18.8%, IWM +19.0%, −0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

RDTY

+18.8%

35.2% as cash

about even with IWM

35.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. RDTY over 1 year: paid 35.2%, price −19.8%, total +18.8%, IWM +19.0%, −0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

RDTE costs 0.76 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; RDTE is 10.2 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

RDTE vs RDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureRDTERDTY
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+18.7%+18.8%
Price change, 1 yearfell 18.5%fell 19.8%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment65% of the Nov 5, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkRussell 2000, measured through IWMRussell 2000, measured through IWM
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.97%1.73%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$153m$15m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · RDTE scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score37.4RDTE36.2RDTY

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Mar 14, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 85 weekly returns · each against IWM
RDTE RDTY
Return
Total return edge RDTE +33.9% +30.1%
Annualized edge RDTE +19.6% +17.5%
Price return edge RDTE (slight) −28.7% −30.9%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 16.9% 16.8%
Max drawdown edge Tie −13.3% −13.1%
Downside capture 93.3% 92.5%
Beta 0.90 0.88
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge RDTE 0.91 0.81
Sortino edge RDTE 1.29 1.09
Treynor 0.170 0.154
Calmar edge RDTE (slight) 1.47 1.33
Against the benchmark
Alpha −1.2% a year −2.6% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.29 −0.55
Information ratio −0.54 −0.75
Tracking error 5.4% 6.3%
Reading

From Mar 2025 to Oct 2026, RDTE returned more: +33.9% to +30.1%. RDTE and RDTY swung about the same: 16.9% and 16.8%. RDTE and RDTY fell about the same at their worst: −13.3% and −13.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: RDTE vs RDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureRDTERDTYIWMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+33.9%+30.1%RDTEPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+19.6%+17.5%RDTETotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−28.7%−30.9%RDTE (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.9%16.8%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.9%12.4%RDTE (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−13.3%−13.1%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture82.4%77.1%100.0%RDTE (slight)Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture93.3%92.5%100.0%TieShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.900.881.00RDTY lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.910.881.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.910.81RDTEReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.291.09RDTEReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1700.1540.183RDTE (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar1.471.33RDTE (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWMIWMIWMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−1.2% a year−2.6% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.29−0.55Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−9.3% to +6.9%−12.0% to +6.8%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.54−0.75RDTEReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.4%6.3%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 85 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, RDTE and RDTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first RDTE RDTY
Only in one fund ↓
Only in RDTE
IWM 11/19/2027 27.81 C 89.88%
Only in RDTY
RUT 12/18/2026 310.26 C 92.27%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.375% 09/15/2027 0.26%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF · 0DTE covered call on IWM, paying weekly RDTY YieldMax R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF · 0DTE covered call on IWM, paying weekly
Strategy 0DTE covered call 0DTE covered call
Benchmark Russell 2000 (IWM) Russell 2000 (IWM)
Pays weekly weekly
Payout rate, annualized 15.6% 35.9%
Expense ratio 0.97% 1.73%
Cash paid, 1 year 33.9% 35.2%
Price change, 1 year −18.5% −19.8%
Total return, 1 year +18.7% +18.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year +19.0% +19.0%
Ahead or behind −0.3 pts −0.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 100% 65%
Age 2.1 years 1.7 years
Net assets, RDTE as of Nov 4, 2026 and RDTY as of Nov 3, 2026 $156m $15m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: RDTE vs RDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowRDTERDTYRDTERDTYRDTERDTY
3 months−2.4%−1.5%6.1%7.7%+2.6 pts+3.5 pts
6 months+3.7%+5.1%14.6%16.5%+4.2 pts+5.6 pts
1 year+18.7%+18.8%33.9%35.2%−0.3 pts−0.2 pts
Since launchNot the same days: RDTE Sep 2024 · RDTY Mar 2025+40.4%+32.2%64.0%53.1%+0.7 pts−8.7 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

RDTE and RDTY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
RDTE

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RDTE paid 33.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 18.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.6%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

RDTY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RDTY paid 35.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.8%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 35.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 65% of the distribution paid Nov 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, RDTE or RDTY?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RDTE paid 33.9% of its starting price in cash and RDTY paid 35.2%, so RDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, RDTE or RDTY?
With every distribution reinvested, RDTE returned +18.7% and RDTY +18.8% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, RDTE or RDTY?
RDTE charges 0.97% a year and RDTY charges 1.73%, so RDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, RDTE against RDTY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/rdte-vs-rdty

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.