Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

RDTY vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RDTY paid 35.2% of its price in cash against RYLD’s 12.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about RDTY and RYLD

Net assets: $15m on Nov 3, 2026 for YieldMax R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, and $1.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF.

At a glance
35.2%
RDTY cash paid, 1 year
12.2%
RYLD cash paid, 1 year
+18.8%
RDTY total return, 1 year
+13.8%
RYLD total return, 1 year
RDTY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 About even with IWM
RDTY
+18.8%
IWM
+19.0%

About even with IWM

RDTY over 1 year: paid 35.2%, price −19.8%, total +18.8%, IWM +19.0%, −0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

RDTY

+18.8%

35.2% of it arrived as cash

about even with IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with IWM

RDTY over 1 year: paid 35.2%, price −19.8%, total +18.8%, IWM +19.0%, −0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

RDTY

+18.8%

35.2% as cash

about even with IWM

35.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. RDTY over 1 year: paid 35.2%, price −19.8%, total +18.8%, IWM +19.0%, −0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
RYLD · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 5.2 pts behind IWM
RYLD
+13.8%
IWM
+19.0%

5.2 pts behind IWM

RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.2%, price +0.9%, total +13.8%, IWM +19.0%, −5.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

RYLD

+13.8%

12.2% of it arrived as cash

5.2 pts behind IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

5.2 pts behind IWM

RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.2%, price +0.9%, total +13.8%, IWM +19.0%, −5.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

RYLD

+13.8%

12.2% cash

5.2 pts behind IWM

12.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.2%, price +0.9%, total +13.8%, IWM +19.0%, −5.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

RYLD costs 1.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.0 points; RYLD is far larger, $1.3bn against $16m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

RDTY vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureRDTYRYLD
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+18.8%+13.8%
Price change, 1 yearfell 19.8%rose 0.9%
Return of capital, issuer estimate65% of the Nov 5, 2026 payment100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkRussell 2000, measured through IWMRussell 2000, measured through IWM
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.73%0.60%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$16m$1.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · RYLD scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score36.2RDTY66.8RYLD

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, RDTY and RYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first RDTY RYLD
Only in one fund ↓
Only in RDTY
RUT 12/18/2026 310.26 C 92.27%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.375% 09/15/2027 0.26%
Only in RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 ETF 100.94%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

RDTY YieldMax R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF · 0DTE covered call on IWM, paying weekly RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF · Covered call on IWM, paying monthly
Strategy 0DTE covered call covered call
Benchmark Russell 2000 (IWM) Russell 2000 (IWM)
Pays weekly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 35.9% 11.5%
Expense ratio 1.73% 0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year 35.2% 12.2%
Price change, 1 year −19.8% +0.9%
Total return, 1 year +18.8% +13.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year +19.0% +19.0%
Ahead or behind −0.2 pts −5.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 65% 100%
Age 1.7 years 7.5 years
Net assets, RDTY as of Nov 3, 2026 and RYLD as of Oct 12, 2026 $15m $1.3bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: RDTY vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowRDTYRYLDRDTYRYLDRDTYRYLD
3 months−1.5%−2.4%7.7%2.8%+3.5 pts+2.6 pts
6 months+5.1%+4.6%16.5%6.0%+5.6 pts+5.1 pts
1 year+18.8%+13.8%35.2%12.2%−0.2 pts−5.2 pts
3 years–+34.4%–34.6%–−33.9 pts
Since launchNot the same days: RDTY Mar 2025 · RYLD Apr 2019+32.2%+49.6%53.1%68.4%−8.7 pts−51.2 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

RDTY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
RDTY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RDTY paid 35.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.8%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 35.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 65% of the distribution paid Nov 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

RYLD

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RYLD paid 12.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.8%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.5%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, RDTY or RYLD?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RDTY paid 35.2% of its starting price in cash and RYLD paid 12.2%, so RDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, RDTY or RYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, RDTY returned +18.8% and RYLD +13.8% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, RDTY or RYLD?
RDTY charges 1.73% a year and RYLD charges 0.60%, so RYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, RDTY against RYLD, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/rdty-vs-ryld

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.