Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
IWMW vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IWMW paid 18.4% of its price in cash against RYLD’s 12.2%, though RYLD returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWMW and RYLDNet assets: $55m on Nov 3, 2026 for iShares IWM Premium Income+ ETF, and $1.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF.
5.9 pts behind IWM
IWMW over 1 year: paid 18.4%, price −6.4%, total +13.1%, IWM +19.0%, −5.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
+19.0%
IWMW
+13.1%
18.4% of it arrived as cash
5.9 pts behind IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
5.9 pts behind IWM
IWMW over 1 year: paid 18.4%, price −6.4%, total +13.1%, IWM +19.0%, −5.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
+19.0%
IWMW
+13.1%
18.4% as cash
5.9 pts behind IWM
18.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. IWMW over 1 year: paid 18.4%, price −6.4%, total +13.1%, IWM +19.0%, −5.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.5.2 pts behind IWM
RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.2%, price +0.9%, total +13.8%, IWM +19.0%, −5.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
+19.0%
RYLD
+13.8%
12.2% of it arrived as cash
5.2 pts behind IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
5.2 pts behind IWM
RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.2%, price +0.9%, total +13.8%, IWM +19.0%, −5.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
+19.0%
RYLD
+13.8%
12.2% cash
5.2 pts behind IWM
12.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.2%, price +0.9%, total +13.8%, IWM +19.0%, −5.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
IWMW costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points; RYLD is far larger, $1.3bn against $55m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | IWMW | RYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.1% | +13.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 6.4% | rose 0.9% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 4% of the Oct 7, 2026 payment | 100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Russell 2000, measured through IWM | Russell 2000, measured through IWM |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.60% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $55m | $1.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWMW and RYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | IWMW | RYLD | IWMW | RYLD | IWMW | RYLD |
| 3 months | −2.7% | −2.4% | 3.4% | 2.8% | +2.3 pts | +2.6 pts |
| 6 months | +6.2% | +4.6% | 8.6% | 6.0% | +6.6 pts | +5.1 pts |
| 1 year | +13.1% | +13.8% | 18.4% | 12.2% | −5.8 pts | −5.2 pts |
| 3 years | – | +34.4% | – | 34.6% | – | −33.9 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: IWMW Mar 2024 · RYLD Apr 2019 | +29.2% | +49.6% | 44.8% | 68.4% | −15.4 pts | −51.2 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
IWMW
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IWMW paid 18.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.1%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 16.9%, paid monthly. iShares estimates that 4% of the distribution paid Oct 7, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
RYLD
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RYLD paid 12.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.8%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.5%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWMW against RYLD, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iwmw-vs-ryld
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). IWMW against RYLD. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iwmw-vs-ryld
[IWMW against RYLD (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iwmw-vs-ryld)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.