Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

IWMW vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IWMW paid 18.4% of its price in cash against RYLD’s 12.2%, though RYLD returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWMW and RYLD

Net assets: $55m on Nov 3, 2026 for iShares IWM Premium Income+ ETF, and $1.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF.

At a glance
18.4%
IWMW cash paid, 1 year
12.2%
RYLD cash paid, 1 year
+13.1%
IWMW total return, 1 year
+13.8%
RYLD total return, 1 year
IWMW · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 5.9 pts behind IWM
IWMW
+13.1%
IWM
+19.0%

5.9 pts behind IWM

IWMW over 1 year: paid 18.4%, price −6.4%, total +13.1%, IWM +19.0%, −5.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

IWMW

+13.1%

18.4% of it arrived as cash

5.9 pts behind IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

5.9 pts behind IWM

IWMW over 1 year: paid 18.4%, price −6.4%, total +13.1%, IWM +19.0%, −5.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

IWMW

+13.1%

18.4% as cash

5.9 pts behind IWM

18.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. IWMW over 1 year: paid 18.4%, price −6.4%, total +13.1%, IWM +19.0%, −5.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
RYLD · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 5.2 pts behind IWM
RYLD
+13.8%
IWM
+19.0%

5.2 pts behind IWM

RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.2%, price +0.9%, total +13.8%, IWM +19.0%, −5.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

RYLD

+13.8%

12.2% of it arrived as cash

5.2 pts behind IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

5.2 pts behind IWM

RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.2%, price +0.9%, total +13.8%, IWM +19.0%, −5.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

RYLD

+13.8%

12.2% cash

5.2 pts behind IWM

12.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.2%, price +0.9%, total +13.8%, IWM +19.0%, −5.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

IWMW costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points; RYLD is far larger, $1.3bn against $55m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

IWMW vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureIWMWRYLD
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+13.1%+13.8%
Price change, 1 yearfell 6.4%rose 0.9%
Return of capital, issuer estimate4% of the Oct 7, 2026 payment100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkRussell 2000, measured through IWMRussell 2000, measured through IWM
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.60%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$55m$1.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · RYLD scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score44IWMW66.8RYLD

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWMW and RYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWMW RYLD
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWMW
ISHARES RUSSELL 2000 ETF 101.25%
NOV26 RUT C @ 2822.61 -0.24%
NOV26 RUTW C @ 2868.08 -0.32%
NOV26 RUT C @ 2822.61 -0.37%
NOV26 RUT C @ 2831.42 -0.42%
Only in RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 ETF 100.94%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWMW iShares IWM Premium Income+ ETF · Covered call on IWM, paying monthly RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF · Covered call on IWM, paying monthly
Strategy covered call covered call
Benchmark Russell 2000 (IWM) Russell 2000 (IWM)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 16.9% 11.5%
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year 18.4% 12.2%
Price change, 1 year −6.4% +0.9%
Total return, 1 year +13.1% +13.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year +19.0% +19.0%
Ahead or behind −5.9 pts −5.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 4% 100%
Age 2.6 years 7.5 years
Net assets, IWMW as of Nov 3, 2026 and RYLD as of Oct 12, 2026 $55m $1.3bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: IWMW vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowIWMWRYLDIWMWRYLDIWMWRYLD
3 months−2.7%−2.4%3.4%2.8%+2.3 pts+2.6 pts
6 months+6.2%+4.6%8.6%6.0%+6.6 pts+5.1 pts
1 year+13.1%+13.8%18.4%12.2%−5.8 pts−5.2 pts
3 years–+34.4%–34.6%–−33.9 pts
Since launchNot the same days: IWMW Mar 2024 · RYLD Apr 2019+29.2%+49.6%44.8%68.4%−15.4 pts−51.2 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

IWMW flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWMW

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IWMW paid 18.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.1%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 16.9%, paid monthly. iShares estimates that 4% of the distribution paid Oct 7, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

RYLD

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RYLD paid 12.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.8%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.5%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, IWMW or RYLD?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IWMW paid 18.4% of its starting price in cash and RYLD paid 12.2%, so IWMW paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, IWMW or RYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, IWMW returned +13.1% and RYLD +13.8% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, IWMW or RYLD?
IWMW charges 0.39% a year and RYLD charges 0.60%, so IWMW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWMW against RYLD, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iwmw-vs-ryld

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.