Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

JEPQ vs RYLD: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year RYLD paid 12.3% of its price in cash against JEPQ’s 12.0%, though JEPQ returned more with it reinvested.

JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

12.0%JEPQ cash paid, 1 year
12.3%RYLD cash paid, 1 year
+18.9%JEPQ total return, 1 year
+18.1%RYLD total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: RYLD scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

JEPQ 65.5RYLD 65.73.2, the lowest in this set96.9, the highest

A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

JEPQ4.1 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ+23.0%JEPQ+18.9%12.0% of it arrived as cash4.1 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.0%JEPQ+18.9%4.1 pts behind QQQ
RYLD3.1 pts behind IWM · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
IWM+21.2%RYLD+18.1%12.3% of it arrived as cash3.1 pts behind IWMTotal return, distributions reinvestedIWM+21.2%RYLD+18.1%3.1 pts behind IWM

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, JEPQ and RYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in JEPQOnly in RYLD
NVIDIA Corp. 6.68%GLOBAL X RUSSELL 2000 ETF 99.96%
Apple, Inc. 5.83%CASH 0.04%
Micron Technology, Inc. 5.58%
Alphabet, Inc. 5.05%
Microsoft Corp. 3.90%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3.87%
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.67%
Lam Research Corp. 2.89%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.

Performance, window by window

JEPQ and RYLD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
JEPQRYLDJEPQRYLDJEPQRYLD
3 months+3.3%+3.9%3.4%3.1%+4.1 pts+5.1 pts
6 months+12.6%+13.1%6.6%6.3%−8.1 pts−4.5 pts
1 year+18.9%+18.1%12.0%12.3%−4.1 pts−3.1 pts
3 years+71.5%+30.9%37.1%32.7%−23.6 pts−31.7 pts
Since launch+90.2%+51.9%49.2%67.2%−32.5 pts−51.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
JEPQ and RYLD on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Covered call on IWM, paying monthly
IssuerJPMorganGlobal X
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)Russell 2000 (IWM)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized13.7%12.4%
Expense ratio0.35%0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year12.0%12.3%
Price change, 1 year+6.0%+4.7%
Total return, 1 year+18.9%+18.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year+23.0%+21.2%
Ahead or behind−4.1 pts−3.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published100%
Age1591 days2699 days

JEPQ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, JEPQ paid 12.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.9%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.1 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.7%, paid monthly.

RYLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, RYLD paid 12.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.1%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +21.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.1 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.4%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, JEPQ or RYLD?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, JEPQ paid 12.0% of its starting price in cash and RYLD paid 12.3%, so RYLD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, JEPQ or RYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, JEPQ returned +18.9% and RYLD returned +18.1% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so JEPQ returned more.
Which is cheaper, JEPQ or RYLD?
JEPQ charges 0.35% a year and RYLD charges 0.60%, so JEPQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

JEPQ against RYLD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, JEPQ against RYLD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/jepq-vs-ryld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources