Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QYLD vs RYLD: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QYLD paid 12.5% of its price in cash against RYLD’s 12.3%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

12.5%QYLD cash paid, 1 year
12.3%RYLD cash paid, 1 year
+22.2%QYLD total return, 1 year
+18.1%RYLD total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QYLD scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QYLD 77.5RYLD 65.73.2, the lowest in this set96.9, the highest

A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QYLD0.7 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ+23.0%QYLD+22.2%12.5% of it arrived as cash0.7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.0%QYLD+22.2%12.5% cash0.7 pts behind QQQ
RYLD3.1 pts behind IWM · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
IWM+21.2%RYLD+18.1%12.3% of it arrived as cash3.1 pts behind IWMTotal return, distributions reinvestedIWM+21.2%RYLD+18.1%3.1 pts behind IWM

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QYLD and RYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QYLD and RYLD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQYLDRYLD
CASH0.21%0.04%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QYLDOnly in RYLD
NVIDIA CORP 8.46%GLOBAL X RUSSELL 2000 ETF 99.96%
APPLE INC 7.81%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.90%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.86%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.42%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.72%
ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.16%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 11, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QYLD and RYLD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QYLDRYLDQYLDRYLDQYLDRYLD
3 months+4.7%+3.9%3.0%3.1%+5.5 pts+5.1 pts
6 months+11.8%+13.1%6.2%6.3%−8.9 pts−4.5 pts
1 year+22.2%+18.1%12.5%12.3%−0.7 pts−3.1 pts
3 years+51.3%+30.9%36.6%32.7%−43.8 pts−31.7 pts
Since launch+195.4%+51.9%116.0%67.2%−639.0 pts−51.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QYLD and RYLD on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Covered call on IWM, paying monthly
IssuerGlobal XGlobal X
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)Russell 2000 (IWM)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized11.9%12.4%
Expense ratio0.60%0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year12.5%12.3%
Price change, 1 year+8.4%+4.7%
Total return, 1 year+22.2%+18.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year+23.0%+21.2%
Ahead or behind−0.7 pts−3.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate100%100%
Age4656 days2699 days

QYLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QYLD paid 12.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.9%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

RYLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, RYLD paid 12.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.1%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +21.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.1 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.4%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QYLD or RYLD?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QYLD paid 12.5% of its starting price in cash and RYLD paid 12.3%, so QYLD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QYLD or RYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, QYLD returned +22.2% and RYLD returned +18.1% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so QYLD returned more.
Which is cheaper, QYLD or RYLD?
QYLD charges 0.60% a year and RYLD charges 0.60%, so QYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QYLD against RYLD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QYLD against RYLD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qyld-vs-ryld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources