Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

GPIQ vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, RYLD paid 12.1% of its price in cash against GPIQ’s 10.6%, though GPIQ returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GPIQ and RYLD

Net assets: $6.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF, and $1.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF.

At a glance
10.6%
GPIQ cash paid, 1 year
12.1%
RYLD cash paid, 1 year
+16.1%
GPIQ total return, 1 year
+12.1%
RYLD total return, 1 year
GPIQ · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 0.9 pts ahead of QQQ
GPIQ
+16.1%
QQQ
+15.2%

0.9 pts ahead of QQQ

GPIQ over 1 year: paid 10.6%, price +4.5%, total +16.1%, QQQ +15.2%, +0.9 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

QQQ

+15.2%

GPIQ

+16.1%

10.6% of it arrived as cash

0.9 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

0.9 pts ahead of QQQ

GPIQ over 1 year: paid 10.6%, price +4.5%, total +16.1%, QQQ +15.2%, +0.9 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

QQQ

+15.2%

GPIQ

+16.1%

10.6% cash

0.9 pts ahead of QQQ

10.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. GPIQ over 1 year: paid 10.6%, price +4.5%, total +16.1%, QQQ +15.2%, +0.9 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Data to Oct 28, 2026.
RYLD · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 2 pts behind IWM
RYLD
+12.1%
IWM
+14.1%

2 pts behind IWM

RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price −0.6%, total +12.1%, IWM +14.1%, −2.0 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

IWM

+14.1%

RYLD

+12.1%

12.1% of it arrived as cash

2 pts behind IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

2 pts behind IWM

RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price −0.6%, total +12.1%, IWM +14.1%, −2.0 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

IWM

+14.1%

RYLD

+12.1%

12.1% as cash

2 pts behind IWM

12.1% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price −0.6%, total +12.1%, IWM +14.1%, −2.0 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Pair scorecard

GPIQ costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.0 points; GPIQ is 5.0 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

GPIQ vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureGPIQRYLD
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+16.1%+12.1%
Price change, 1 yearrose 4.5%fell 0.6%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkNasdaq-100, measured through QQQRussell 2000, measured through IWM
Against its benchmark, same daysahead by 0.9 ptsbehind by 2.0 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.29%0.60%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$6.5bn$1.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · GPIQ scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score79.6GPIQ57.6RYLD

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 164 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

A percentile among the 164 income ETFs not writing on a single company. One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 3, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 155 weekly returns
GPIQ RYLD
Return
Total return edge GPIQ +82.6% +32.2%
Annualized edge GPIQ +22.4% +9.8%
Price return edge GPIQ +34.3% −7.8%
Risk
Volatility edge RYLD 16.5% 10.3%
Max drawdown edge RYLD −19.5% −15.3%
Downside capture 88.7% 62.8%
Beta 0.85 0.54
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge GPIQ 1.04 0.53
Sortino edge GPIQ 1.57 0.70
Treynor 0.202 0.063
Calmar edge GPIQ 1.15 0.64
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.3% a year −1.3% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.29 −0.43
Information ratio −0.79 −0.38
Tracking error 3.4% 13.9%

Each against its own benchmark: GPIQ against QQQ, Nov 3, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026; RYLD against IWM, May 3, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

GPIQ returned more: +82.6% to +32.2%. RYLD swung less: 10.3% to 16.5%. RYLD fell less at its worst: −15.3% to −19.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GPIQ vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureGPIQRYLDEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+82.6%+32.2%GPIQPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+22.4%+9.8%GPIQTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+34.3%−7.8%GPIQPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.5%10.3%RYLDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.0%7.8%RYLDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−19.5%−15.3%RYLDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture76.7%33.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture88.7%62.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.850.54Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.990.73Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe1.040.53GPIQReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.570.70GPIQReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.2020.063Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar1.150.64GPIQAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkQQQIWMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.3% a year−1.3% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.29−0.43Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.7% to +2.3%−7.0% to +4.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.79−0.38Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.4%13.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 155 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, GPIQ and RYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GPIQ RYLD
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GPIQ
NVIDIA CORP 7.47%
APPLE INC 6.59%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.62%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.20%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 4.10%
MICROSOFT CORP 3.95%
ALPHABET INC 3.54%
TESLA INC 3.17%
Only in RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 ETF 100.94%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF · Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF · Covered call on IWM, paying monthly
Strategy covered call covered call
Benchmark Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) Russell 2000 (IWM)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 10.7% 11.5%
Expense ratio 0.29% 0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year 10.6% 12.1%
Price change, 1 year +4.5% −0.6%
Total return, 1 year +16.1% +12.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year +15.2% +14.1%
Ahead or behind +0.9 pts −2.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 100%
Age 3.0 years 7.5 years
Net assets, GPIQ as of Oct 27, 2026 and RYLD as of Oct 12, 2026 $6.5bn $1.3bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: GPIQ vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowGPIQRYLDGPIQRYLDGPIQRYLD
3 months+9.1%−0.3%2.8%2.9%−0.7 pts+1.9 pts
6 months+9.1%+6.8%5.5%6.2%−0.8 pts+2.9 pts
1 year+16.1%+12.1%10.6%12.1%+0.9 pts−2.1 pts
3 years+99.1%+38.8%39.4%35.9%−14.6 pts−40.5 pts
Since launchNot the same days: GPIQ Oct 2023 · RYLD Apr 2019+99.7%+49.0%39.5%68.4%−15.0 pts−50.0 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-E45A1A18CA

GPIQ and RYLD are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each is measured against. GPIQ is measured against Nasdaq-100 through QQQ and RYLD against Russell 2000 through IWM.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 GPIQ returned +16.1% and RYLD +12.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.0 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GPIQ

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GPIQ paid 10.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.9 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.7%, paid monthly.

RYLD

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, RYLD paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.1%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +14.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.0 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.5%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, GPIQ or RYLD?
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GPIQ paid 10.6% of its starting price in cash and RYLD paid 12.1%, so RYLD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIQ or RYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, GPIQ returned +16.1% and RYLD +12.1% over the year to Oct 28, 2026.
Which is cheaper, GPIQ or RYLD?
GPIQ charges 0.29% a year and RYLD charges 0.60%, so GPIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GPIQ against RYLD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpiq-vs-ryld

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.