Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

RYLD vs YMAX: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, YMAX paid 36.1% of its price in cash against RYLD’s 12.1%, though RYLD returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about RYLD and YMAX

Net assets: $1.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF, and $352m on Oct 27, 2026 for YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs.

At a glance
12.1%
RYLD cash paid, 1 year
36.1%
YMAX cash paid, 1 year
+12.1%
RYLD total return, 1 year
−4.0%
YMAX total return, 1 year
RYLD · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 2 pts behind IWM
RYLD
+12.1%
IWM
+14.1%

2 pts behind IWM

RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price −0.6%, total +12.1%, IWM +14.1%, −2.0 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

IWM

+14.1%

RYLD

+12.1%

12.1% of it arrived as cash

2 pts behind IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

2 pts behind IWM

RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price −0.6%, total +12.1%, IWM +14.1%, −2.0 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

IWM

+14.1%

RYLD

+12.1%

12.1% cash

2 pts behind IWM

12.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price −0.6%, total +12.1%, IWM +14.1%, −2.0 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Data to Oct 28, 2026.
YMAX · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 14.9 pts behind its own holdings
YMAX
−4.0%
Own
+10.9%

14.9 pts behind its own holdings

YMAX over 1 year: paid 36.1%, price −42.4%, total −4.0%, its own holdings +10.9%, −14.9 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

its own holdings

+10.9%

YMAX

−4.0%

14.9 pts behind its own holdings

Total return, distributions reinvested

14.9 pts behind its own holdings

YMAX over 1 year: paid 36.1%, price −42.4%, total −4.0%, its own holdings +10.9%, −14.9 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

its own holdings

+10.9%

YMAX

−4.0%

14.9 pts behind its own holdings

36.1% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. YMAX over 1 year: paid 36.1%, price −42.4%, total −4.0%, its own holdings +10.9%, −14.9 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Pair scorecard

RYLD costs 0.73 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.1 points; RYLD is 3.6 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

RYLD vs YMAX: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureRYLDYMAX
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+12.1%−4.0%
Price change, 1 yearfell 0.6%fell 42.4%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment35% of the Oct 29, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkRussell 2000, measured through IWMits own holdings
Against its benchmark, same daysbehind by 2.0 ptsbehind by 14.9 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.60%1.33%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$1.3bn$366m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · RYLD scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score57.6RYLD16.2YMAX

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 164 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

A percentile among the 164 income ETFs not writing on a single company. One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jan 26, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 143 weekly returns
RYLD YMAX
Return
Total return edge YMAX +29.1% +38.1%
Annualized edge YMAX +9.7% +12.5%
Price return edge RYLD −7.3% −64.9%
Risk
Volatility edge RYLD 10.6% 21.8%
Max drawdown edge RYLD −15.3% −24.1%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge RYLD 0.52 0.45
Sortino edge RYLD (slight) 0.68 0.65
Calmar edge RYLD 0.64 0.52
Reading

YMAX returned more: +38.1% to +29.1%. RYLD swung less: 10.6% to 21.8%. RYLD fell less at its worst: −15.3% to −24.1%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: RYLD vs YMAX: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureRYLDYMAXEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+29.1%+38.1%YMAXPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.7%+12.5%YMAXTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−7.3%−64.9%RYLDPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility10.6%21.8%RYLDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation8.0%15.1%RYLDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−15.3%−24.1%RYLDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.520.45RYLDReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.680.65RYLD (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.640.52RYLDAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 143 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, RYLD and YMAX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first RYLD YMAX
Only in one fund ↓
Only in RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 ETF 100.94%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
Only in YMAX
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF 5.17%
YieldMaxTM PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF 5.06%
YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF 4.93%
YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF 4.75%
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF 4.53%
YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF 4.53%
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF 4.41%
YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF 4.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF · Covered call on IWM, paying monthly YMAX YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs · Synthetic covered call on its own holdings, paying weekly
Strategy covered call synthetic covered call
Benchmark Russell 2000 (IWM) YMAX's own holdings, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Oct 26, 2026)
Pays monthly weekly
Payout rate, annualized 11.5% 39.9%
Expense ratio 0.60% 1.33%
Cash paid, 1 year 12.1% 36.1%
Price change, 1 year −0.6% −42.4%
Total return, 1 year +12.1% −4.0%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.1% +10.9%
Ahead or behind −2.0 pts −14.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 100% 35%
Age 7.5 years 2.8 years
Net assets, RYLD as of Oct 12, 2026 and YMAX as of Oct 27, 2026 $1.3bn $352m

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: RYLD vs YMAX: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowRYLDYMAXRYLDYMAXRYLDYMAX
3 months−0.3%+10.0%2.9%10.6%+1.9 pts−18.4 pts
6 months+6.8%+10.4%6.2%22.3%+2.9 pts−15.1 pts
1 year+12.1%−4.0%12.1%36.1%−2.1 pts−14.9 pts
3 years+38.8%–35.9%–−40.5 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: RYLD Apr 2019 · YMAX Jan 2024+49.0%+43.9%68.4%93.4%−50.0 ptsnot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-AA9E70E5A8

RYLD and YMAX are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Income paid. RYLD paid 12.1% and YMAX 36.1% (cash paid over 1 year, as a share of its price at the start), a gap of 24.0 points.
  2. What each is measured against. RYLD is measured against Russell 2000 through IWM and YMAX against its own holdings.
  3. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026).

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

YMAX flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
RYLD

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, RYLD paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.1%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +14.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.0 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.5%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

YMAX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, YMAX paid 36.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 42.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −4.0%. YMAX's own holdings, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Oct 26, 2026) returned +10.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.9 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 39.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 35% of the distribution paid Oct 29, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, RYLD or YMAX?
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, RYLD paid 12.1% of its starting price in cash and YMAX paid 36.1%, so YMAX paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, RYLD or YMAX?
With every distribution reinvested, RYLD returned +12.1% and YMAX −4.0% over the year to Oct 28, 2026.
Which is cheaper, RYLD or YMAX?
RYLD charges 0.60% a year and YMAX charges 1.33%, so RYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, RYLD against YMAX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ryld-vs-ymax

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.