Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

ITWO vs IWMW: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IWMW paid 18.4% of its price in cash against ITWO’s 8.6%, though ITWO returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ITWO and IWMW

Net assets: $182m on Nov 4, 2026 for ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF, and $55m on Nov 3, 2026 for iShares IWM Premium Income+ ETF.

At a glance
8.6%
ITWO cash paid, 1 year
18.4%
IWMW cash paid, 1 year
+21.6%
ITWO total return, 1 year
+13.1%
IWMW total return, 1 year
ITWO · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 2.6 pts ahead of IWM
ITWO
+21.6%
IWM
+19.0%

2.6 pts ahead of IWM

ITWO over 1 year: paid 8.6%, price +12.4%, total +21.6%, IWM +19.0%, +2.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

ITWO

+21.6%

8.6% of it arrived as cash

2.6 pts ahead of IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.6 pts ahead of IWM

ITWO over 1 year: paid 8.6%, price +12.4%, total +21.6%, IWM +19.0%, +2.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

ITWO

+21.6%

2.6 pts ahead of IWM

8.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ITWO over 1 year: paid 8.6%, price +12.4%, total +21.6%, IWM +19.0%, +2.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWMW · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 5.9 pts behind IWM
IWMW
+13.1%
IWM
+19.0%

5.9 pts behind IWM

IWMW over 1 year: paid 18.4%, price −6.4%, total +13.1%, IWM +19.0%, −5.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

IWMW

+13.1%

18.4% of it arrived as cash

5.9 pts behind IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

5.9 pts behind IWM

IWMW over 1 year: paid 18.4%, price −6.4%, total +13.1%, IWM +19.0%, −5.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

IWMW

+13.1%

18.4% cash

5.9 pts behind IWM

18.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. IWMW over 1 year: paid 18.4%, price −6.4%, total +13.1%, IWM +19.0%, −5.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

IWMW costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.5 points; ITWO is 3.3 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ITWO vs IWMW: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureITWOIWMW
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+21.6%+13.1%
Price change, 1 yearrose 12.4%fell 6.4%
Return of capital, issuer estimate89% of the Nov 6, 2026 payment4% of the Oct 7, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkRussell 2000, measured through IWMRussell 2000, measured through IWM
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.55%0.39%
Net assets$182m$55m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · ITWO scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score93.1ITWO44IWMW

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, ITWO and IWMW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ITWO IWMW
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ITWO
JFrog Ltd. 0.32%
Moog, Inc. 0.31%
UMB Financial Corp. 0.30%
Glaukos Corp. 0.30%
Brinker International, Inc. 0.29%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 0.28%
Cytokinetics, Inc. 0.27%
Krystal Biotech, Inc. 0.27%
Only in IWMW
ISHARES RUSSELL 2000 ETF 101.25%
NOV26 RUT C @ 2822.61 -0.24%
NOV26 RUTW C @ 2868.08 -0.32%
NOV26 RUT C @ 2822.61 -0.37%
NOV26 RUT C @ 2831.42 -0.42%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ITWO ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF · Option income on IWM, paying monthly IWMW iShares IWM Premium Income+ ETF · Covered call on IWM, paying monthly
Strategy option income covered call
Benchmark Russell 2000 (IWM) Russell 2000 (IWM)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 5.9% 16.9%
Expense ratio 0.55% 0.39%
Cash paid, 1 year 8.6% 18.4%
Price change, 1 year +12.4% −6.4%
Total return, 1 year +21.6% +13.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year +19.0% +19.0%
Ahead or behind +2.6 pts −5.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 89% 4%
Age 2.2 years 2.6 years
Net assets, ITWO as of Nov 4, 2026 and IWMW as of Nov 3, 2026 $182m $55m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: ITWO vs IWMW: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowITWOIWMWITWOIWMWITWOIWMW
3 months−4.2%−2.7%1.4%3.4%+0.8 pts+2.3 pts
6 months+1.3%+6.2%3.0%8.6%+1.7 pts+6.6 pts
1 year+21.6%+13.1%8.6%18.4%+2.7 pts−5.8 pts
Since launchNot the same days: ITWO Sep 2024 · IWMW Mar 2024+40.0%+29.2%23.6%44.8%+2.7 pts−15.4 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

ITWO and IWMW flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ITWO

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ITWO paid 8.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.6%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.6 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.9%, paid monthly. ProShares estimates that 89% of the distribution paid Nov 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

IWMW

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IWMW paid 18.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.1%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 16.9%, paid monthly. iShares estimates that 4% of the distribution paid Oct 7, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ITWO or IWMW?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ITWO paid 8.6% of its starting price in cash and IWMW paid 18.4%, so IWMW paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ITWO or IWMW?
With every distribution reinvested, ITWO returned +21.6% and IWMW +13.1% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, ITWO or IWMW?
ITWO charges 0.55% a year and IWMW charges 0.39%, so IWMW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ITWO against IWMW, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/itwo-vs-iwmw

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.