Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
ITWO vs RYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RYLG paid 10.7% of its price in cash against ITWO’s 8.6%, though ITWO returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ITWO and RYLG
Net assets: $182m on Nov 4, 2026 for ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF, and $7.7m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF.
2.6 pts ahead of IWM
ITWO over 1 year: paid 8.6%, price +12.4%, total +21.6%, IWM +19.0%, +2.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
+19.0%
ITWO
+21.6%
8.6% of it arrived as cash
2.6 pts ahead of IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
2.6 pts ahead of IWM
ITWO over 1 year: paid 8.6%, price +12.4%, total +21.6%, IWM +19.0%, +2.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
+19.0%
ITWO
+21.6%
2.6 pts ahead of IWM
8.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ITWO over 1 year: paid 8.6%, price +12.4%, total +21.6%, IWM +19.0%, +2.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.3 pts behind IWM
RYLG over 1 year: paid 10.7%, price +4.4%, total +16.0%, IWM +19.0%, −3.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
+19.0%
RYLG
+16.0%
10.7% of it arrived as cash
3 pts behind IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
3 pts behind IWM
RYLG over 1 year: paid 10.7%, price +4.4%, total +16.0%, IWM +19.0%, −3.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
+19.0%
RYLG
+16.0%
3 pts behind IWM
10.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +21.6%. RYLG over 1 year: paid 10.7%, price +4.4%, total +16.0%, IWM +19.0%, −3.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Both charts share one scale, 0 to +21.6%. Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
RYLG costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.6 points; ITWO is far larger, $184m against $7.7m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ITWO | RYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +21.6% | +16.0% |
| Price change, 1 year | rose 12.4% | rose 4.4% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 89% of the Nov 6, 2026 payment | 100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Russell 2000, measured through IWM | Russell 2000, measured through IWM |
| Against its benchmark, same days | ahead by 2.6 pts | behind by 3.0 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.55% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $184m | $7.7m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ITWO and RYLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ITWO | RYLG | ITWO | RYLG | ITWO | RYLG |
| 3 months | −4.2% | −3.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | +0.8 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +1.3% | +2.0% | 3.0% | 3.4% | +1.7 pts | +2.5 pts |
| 1 year | +21.6% | +16.0% | 8.6% | 10.7% | +2.7 pts | −3.0 pts |
| 3 years | – | +50.0% | – | 40.2% | – | −18.3 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: ITWO Sep 2024 · RYLG Oct 2022 | +40.0% | +46.2% | 23.6% | 44.5% | +2.7 pts | −24.6 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
ITWO
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ITWO paid 8.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.6%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.6 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.9%, paid monthly. ProShares estimates that 89% of the distribution paid Nov 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
RYLG
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RYLG paid 10.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.0%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.7%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ITWO against RYLG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/itwo-vs-rylg
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). ITWO against RYLG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/itwo-vs-rylg
[ITWO against RYLG (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/itwo-vs-rylg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.