Data as of .
ACRT vs ITWO: which paid, and which earned it?
ACRT and ITWO both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACRT and ITWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACRT | Only in ITWO |
|---|---|
| RU2K LADDERED AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00% | Bloom Energy Corp. 1.83% |
| Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. 1.12% | |
| Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. 0.75% | |
| IonQ, Inc. 0.73% | |
| Fabrinet 0.69% | |
| Nextpower, Inc. 0.67% | |
| Coeur Mining, Inc. 0.58% | |
| TTM Technologies, Inc. 0.52% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACRT | ITWO | ACRT | ITWO | ACRT | ITWO | |
| 3 months | not published | −3.2% | not published | 1.5% | not published | +0.5 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +18.3% | not published | 5.0% | not published | +0.4 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +19.6% | not published | 8.4% | not published | +2.4 pts |
| Since launch | −6.7% | +39.2% | 0.0% | 22.5% | −0.1 pts | +1.8 pts |
| ACRT ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on IWM | ITWO ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF Option income on IWM, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | ProShares |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| Benchmark | Russell 2000 (IWM) | Russell 2000 (IWM) |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | 5.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.55% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 8.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | −6.7% | +10.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | −6.7% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | +19.6% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −6.6% | +17.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.1 pts | +2.4 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 35 days | 743 days |
| Net assets | $2m | $189m |
ACRT in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −6.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −6.6% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
ITWO in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ITWO paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 10.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.6%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +17.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.9%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, ACRT or ITWO?
- ACRT charges 0.72% a year and ITWO charges 0.55%, so ITWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACRT against ITWO, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-itwo Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.