ACRT vs ACYS: which paid, and which earned it?
ACRT and ACYS both write options for income. ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF.
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
3.8 pts behind SPY
ACYS since launch: paid 1.9%, price +2.4%, total +4.4%, SPY +8.2%, −3.8 pts.
SPY
+8.2%
ACYS
+4.4%
3.8 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
3.8 pts behind SPY
ACYS since launch: paid 1.9%, price +2.4%, total +4.4%, SPY +8.2%, −3.8 pts.
SPY
+8.2%
ACYS
+4.4%
3.8 pts behind SPY
1.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +8.2%. ACYS since launch: paid 1.9%, price +2.4%, total +4.4%, SPY +8.2%, −3.8 pts.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACRT and ACYS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACRT | ACYS | ACRT | ACYS | ACRT | ACYS |
| 3 months | not published | +2.4% | not published | 1.3% | not published | −0.1 pts |
| Since launch ACRT Aug 2026 · ACYS Apr 2026 | −8.7% | +4.4% | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.0 pts | −3.8 pts |
ACRT and ACYS over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACRT and ACYS on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACRT in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −8.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −8.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
ACYS in plain words
Over the period since launch on Apr 23, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACYS paid 1.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +8.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACRT against ACYS, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acys
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACRT against ACYS, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acys Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACRT against ACYS, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acys
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACRT against ACYS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acys
- Markdown
- [ACRT against ACYS (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acys)