ACRT vs ACYN: which paid, and which earned it?
ACRT and ACYN both write options for income. ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF.
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
2.7 pts behind SPY
ACYN since launch: paid 4.5%, price +3.5%, total +8.2%, SPY +10.9%, −2.7 pts.
SPY
+10.9%
ACYN
+8.2%
4.5% as cash
2.7 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
2.7 pts behind SPY
ACYN since launch: paid 4.5%, price +3.5%, total +8.2%, SPY +10.9%, −2.7 pts.
SPY
+10.9%
ACYN
+8.2%
2.7 pts behind SPY
4.5% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +10.9%. ACYN since launch: paid 4.5%, price +3.5%, total +8.2%, SPY +10.9%, −2.7 pts.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACRT and ACYN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACRT | ACYN | ACRT | ACYN | ACRT | ACYN |
| 3 months | not published | +3.2% | not published | 1.8% | not published | +0.7 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +7.0% | not published | 4.4% | not published | −10.0 pts |
| Since launch ACRT Aug 2026 · ACYN Feb 2026 | −8.7% | +8.2% | 0.0% | 4.5% | 0.0 pts | −2.7 pts |
ACRT and ACYN over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACRT and ACYN on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACRT in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −8.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −8.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
ACYN in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 25, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACYN paid 4.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.2%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +10.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.7 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.9%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACRT against ACYN, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acyn
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACRT against ACYN, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acyn Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACRT against ACYN, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acyn
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACRT against ACYN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acyn
- Markdown
- [ACRT against ACYN (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acyn)