ACRT vs ANV: which paid, and which earned it?
ACRT and ANV both write options for income. ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF.
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
9.5% as cash
13.8 pts behind NVDA
Total return, distributions reinvested
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
13.8 pts behind NVDA
9.5% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.9%. ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACRT | ANV | ACRT | ANV | ACRT | ANV |
| 3 months | not published | +5.3% | not published | 2.5% | not published | −10.4 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +11.1% | not published | 6.8% | not published | −19.2 pts |
| Since launch ACRT Aug 2026 · ANV Feb 2026 | −8.7% | +13.2% | 0.0% | 9.5% | 0.0 pts | −13.8 pts |
ACRT and ANV over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACRT and ANV on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACRT in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −8.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −8.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
ANV in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ANV paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.9%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 5% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACRT against ANV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-anv
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACRT against ANV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-anv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACRT against ANV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-anv
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACRT against ANV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-anv
- Markdown
- [ACRT against ANV (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-anv)