Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ITWO vs IWMI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year IWMI paid 15.9% of its price in cash against ITWO’s 8.4%, though ITWO returned more with it reinvested.

ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF.

8.4%ITWO cash paid, 1 year
15.9%IWMI cash paid, 1 year
+19.6%ITWO total return, 1 year
+18.4%IWMI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: ITWO scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

ITWO 89IWMI 71.93.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

ITWO2.4 pts ahead of IWM · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IWM+17.2%ITWO+19.6%8.4% of it arrived as cash2.4 pts ahead of IWMTotal return, distributions reinvestedIWM+17.2%ITWO+19.6%2.4 pts ahead of IWM
IWMI1.1 pts ahead of IWM · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IWM+17.2%IWMI+18.4%15.9% of it arrived as cash1.1 pts ahead of IWMTotal return, distributions reinvestedIWM+17.2%IWMI+18.4%15.9% as cash1.1 pts ahead of IWM

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ITWO and IWMI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ITWOOnly in IWMI
Bloom Energy Corp. 1.83%Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF 100.10%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. 1.12%RUT US 10/16/26 C3050 -0.03%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. 0.75%RUT US 10/16/26 C3005 -0.07%
IonQ, Inc. 0.73%
Fabrinet 0.69%
Nextpower, Inc. 0.67%
Coeur Mining, Inc. 0.58%
TTM Technologies, Inc. 0.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ITWO and IWMI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ITWOIWMIITWOIWMIITWOIWMI
3 months−3.2%−1.7%1.5%3.5%+0.5 pts+1.9 pts
6 months+18.3%+16.0%5.0%8.0%+0.4 pts−1.9 pts
1 year+19.6%+18.4%8.4%15.9%+2.4 pts+1.1 pts
Since launch+39.2%+40.2%22.5%33.3%+1.8 pts−4.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ITWO and IWMI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ITWO
ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF
Option income on IWM, paying monthly
IWMI
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF
Option income on IWM, paying monthly
IssuerProSharesNEOS
Strategyoption incomeoption income
BenchmarkRussell 2000 (IWM)Russell 2000 (IWM)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized5.9%14.6%
Expense ratio0.55%0.68%
Cash paid, 1 year8.4%15.9%
Price change, 1 year+10.5%+1.3%
Total return, 1 year+19.6%+18.4%
Benchmark return, 1 year+17.2%+17.2%
Ahead or behind+2.4 pts+1.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published100%
Age743 days815 days
Net assets$189m$1.3bn

ITWO in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ITWO paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 10.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.6%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +17.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.9%, paid monthly.

IWMI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IWMI paid 15.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.4%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +17.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.6%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ITWO or IWMI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ITWO paid 8.4% of its starting price in cash and IWMI paid 15.9%, so IWMI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ITWO or IWMI?
With every distribution reinvested, ITWO returned +19.6% and IWMI returned +18.4% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so ITWO returned more.
Which is cheaper, ITWO or IWMI?
ITWO charges 0.55% a year and IWMI charges 0.68%, so ITWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ITWO against IWMI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ITWO against IWMI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/itwo-vs-iwmi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources