Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

IWMI vs OVS: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IWMI paid 15.0% of its price in cash against OVS’s 11.3%, though OVS returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWMI and OVS

Net assets: $1.3bn on Oct 28, 2026 for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF, and $39m on Aug 31, 2026 for Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF.

At a glance
15.0%
IWMI cash paid, 1 year
11.3%
OVS cash paid, 1 year
+18.6%
IWMI total return, 1 year
+26.4%
OVS total return, 1 year
IWMI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 About even with IWM
IWMI
+18.6%
IWM
+19.0%

About even with IWM

IWMI over 1 year: paid 15.0%, price +2.8%, total +18.6%, IWM +19.0%, −0.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

IWMI

+18.6%

15.0% of it arrived as cash

about even with IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with IWM

IWMI over 1 year: paid 15.0%, price +2.8%, total +18.6%, IWM +19.0%, −0.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

IWMI

+18.6%

15.0% cash

about even with IWM

15.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. IWMI over 1 year: paid 15.0%, price +2.8%, total +18.6%, IWM +19.0%, −0.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
OVS · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 2.2 pts ahead of IJR
OVS
+26.4%
IJR
+24.2%

2.2 pts ahead of IJR

OVS over 1 year: paid 11.3%, price +14.4%, total +26.4%, IJR +24.2%, +2.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IJR

+24.2%

OVS

+26.4%

11.3% of it arrived as cash

2.2 pts ahead of IJR

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.2 pts ahead of IJR

OVS over 1 year: paid 11.3%, price +14.4%, total +26.4%, IJR +24.2%, +2.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IJR

+24.2%

OVS

+26.4%

2.2 pts ahead of IJR

11.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.4%. OVS over 1 year: paid 11.3%, price +14.4%, total +26.4%, IJR +24.2%, +2.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.4%. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

IWMI costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.8 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

IWMI vs OVS: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureIWMIOVS
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+18.6%+26.4%
Price change, 1 yearrose 2.8%rose 14.4%
Return of capital, issuer estimate76% of the Oct 23, 2026 payment100% of the Oct 29, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkRussell 2000, measured through IWMiShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF, measured through IJR
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.68%0.83%
Net assets, IWMI as of Oct 28, 2026 and OVS as of Aug 31, 2026$1.3bn$39m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · OVS scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score71IWMI90.7OVS

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Jul 5, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 121 weekly returns
IWMI OVS
Return
Total return edge OVS (slight) +38.1% +38.9%
Annualized edge Tie +14.9% +15.2%
Price return edge OVS −1.6% +19.6%
Risk
Volatility edge IWMI 15.7% 20.4%
Max drawdown edge IWMI −21.4% −26.7%
Downside capture 83.9% 102.7%
Beta 0.77 1.03
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge IWMI 0.70 0.59
Sortino edge IWMI 0.99 0.87
Treynor 0.142 0.109
Calmar edge IWMI 0.70 0.57
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.9% a year +0.7% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.42 0.32
Information ratio −0.38 0.17
Tracking error 5.6% 5.6%

Each against its own benchmark: IWMI against IWM, Jul 5, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026; OVS against IJR, Oct 11, 2019 to Oct 30, 2026.

Reading

From Jul 2024 to Oct 2026, OVS returned slightly more: +38.9% to +38.1%. IWMI swung less: 15.7% to 20.4%. IWMI fell less at its worst: −21.4% to −26.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWMI vs OVS: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureIWMIOVSEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+38.1%+38.9%OVS (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.9%+15.2%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−1.6%+19.6%OVSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility15.7%20.4%IWMISpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.1%13.8%IWMILike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−21.4%−26.7%IWMIDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture68.4%110.3%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture83.9%102.7%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.771.03Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.960.95Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.700.59IWMIReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.990.87IWMIReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1420.109Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.700.57IWMIAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWMIJRThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.9% a year+0.7% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.420.32Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.3% to +5.1%−3.5% to +4.8%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.380.17Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.6%5.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 121 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWMI and OVS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWMI OVS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWMI
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF 99.81%
RUT US 12/18/26 C2910 -0.43%
RUT US 12/18/26 C2860 -0.65%
Only in OVS
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF 100.03%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF · Option income on IWM, paying monthly OVS Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF · Put-selling overlay on IJR, paying monthly
Strategy option income put-selling overlay
Benchmark Russell 2000 (IWM) iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 13.9% 10.3%
Expense ratio 0.68% 0.83%
Cash paid, 1 year 15.0% 11.3%
Price change, 1 year +2.8% +14.4%
Total return, 1 year +18.6% +26.4%
Benchmark return, 1 year +19.0% +24.2%
Ahead or behind −0.4 pts +2.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 76% 100%
Age 2.4 years 7.1 years
Net assets, IWMI as of Oct 28, 2026 and OVS as of Aug 31, 2026 $1.3bn $39m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: IWMI vs OVS: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowIWMIOVSIWMIOVSIWMIOVS
3 months−3.0%−4.1%3.4%2.5%+2.0 pts−0.4 pts
6 months+1.9%+2.9%7.0%5.2%+2.3 pts−0.6 pts
1 year+18.6%+26.4%15.0%11.3%−0.3 pts+2.2 pts
3 years–+67.1%–22.8%–+8.2 pts
Since launchNot the same days: IWMI Jun 2024 · OVS Oct 2019+40.5%+118.6%34.4%42.4%−4.6 pts+9.8 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWMI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IWMI paid 15.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.9%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 76% of the distribution paid Oct 23, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

OVS

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OVS paid 11.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 14.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +26.4%. iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) returned +24.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.3%, paid monthly. Overlay Shares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 29, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, IWMI or OVS?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IWMI paid 15.0% of its starting price in cash and OVS paid 11.3%, so IWMI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, IWMI or OVS?
With every distribution reinvested, IWMI returned +18.6% and OVS +26.4% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, IWMI or OVS?
IWMI charges 0.68% a year and OVS charges 0.83%, so IWMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWMI against OVS, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iwmi-vs-ovs

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.