Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

IWMY vs RDTY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year RDTY paid 34.2% of its price in cash against IWMY’s 29.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF and YieldMax(R) R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

29.9%IWMY cash paid, 1 year
34.2%RDTY cash paid, 1 year
+6.3%IWMY total return, 1 year
+15.7%RDTY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: RDTY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

IWMY 19.4RDTY 34.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

IWMY10.9 pts behind IWM · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IWM+17.2%IWMY+6.3%29.9% of it arrived as cash10.9 pts behind IWMTotal return, distributions reinvestedIWM+17.2%IWMY+6.3%10.9 pts behind IWM
RDTY1.5 pts behind IWM · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IWM+17.2%RDTY+15.7%34.2% of it arrived as cash1.5 pts behind IWMTotal return, distributions reinvestedIWM+17.2%RDTY+15.7%34.2% as cash1.5 pts behind IWM

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWMY and RDTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in IWMYOnly in RDTY
Rut 12/18/2026 200.34 C 92.47%TREASURY BILL 100.00%
Cash & Other 4.95%
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 2.71%
Rut 09/21/2026 2868.98 C 0.22%
Rut 09/21/2026 2860.4 C -0.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

IWMY and RDTY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
IWMYRDTYIWMYRDTYIWMYRDTY
3 months−3.9%+0.8%7.2%8.8%−0.3 pts+4.4 pts
6 months+14.5%+19.6%16.1%19.5%−3.4 pts+1.7 pts
1 year+6.3%+15.7%29.9%34.2%−10.9 pts−1.5 pts
Since launch+41.5%+30.1%91.8%49.9%−37.1 pts−10.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
IWMY and RDTY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF
Option income on IWM, paying weekly
RDTY
YieldMax(R) R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on IWM, paying weekly
IssuerDefianceYieldMax
Strategyoption income0DTE covered call
BenchmarkRussell 2000 (IWM)Russell 2000 (IWM)
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized30.2%29.1%
Expense ratio1.05%1.73%
Cash paid, 1 year29.9%34.2%
Price change, 1 year−24.9%−21.8%
Total return, 1 year+6.3%+15.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year+17.2%+17.2%
Ahead or behind−10.9 pts−1.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate0%70%
Age1053 days561 days
Net assets$90m$19m

IWMY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IWMY paid 29.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 24.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.3%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +17.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.2%, paid weekly. Defiance estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

RDTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, RDTY paid 34.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +17.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.1%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 70% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, IWMY or RDTY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IWMY paid 29.9% of its starting price in cash and RDTY paid 34.2%, so RDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, IWMY or RDTY?
With every distribution reinvested, IWMY returned +6.3% and RDTY returned +15.7% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so RDTY returned more.
Which is cheaper, IWMY or RDTY?
IWMY charges 1.05% a year and RDTY charges 1.73%, so IWMY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWMY against RDTY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWMY against RDTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iwmy-vs-rdty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources