DACL vs IACL: which paid, and which earned it?

DACL and IACL both write options for income. REX Defensive Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF.

0.6%
DACL cash paid, since launch
0.4%
IACL cash paid, since launch
+0.5%
DACL total return, since launch
+1.1%
IACL total return, since launch
DACL · since launch to Sep 30, 20262.2 pts ahead of SPY
DACL
+0.5%
SPY
−1.7%

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

DACL since launch: paid 0.6%, price −0.1%, total +0.5%, SPY −1.7%, +2.2 pts.

SPY

−1.7%

DACL

+0.5%

0.6% as cash

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

DACL since launch: paid 0.6%, price −0.1%, total +0.5%, SPY −1.7%, +2.2 pts.

SPY

−1.7%

DACL

+0.5%

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

0.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. DACL since launch: paid 0.6%, price −0.1%, total +0.5%, SPY −1.7%, +2.2 pts.

IACL · since launch to Sep 30, 20261.4 pts ahead of SPY
IACL
+1.1%
SPY
−0.4%

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.

SPY

−0.4%

IACL

+1.1%

0.4% cash

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.

SPY

−0.4%

IACL

+1.1%

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

0.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +1.1%. IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowDACLIACLDACLIACLDACLIACL
Since launch
DACL Aug 2026 · IACL Aug 2026
+0.5%+1.1%0.6%0.4%+2.2 pts+1.4 pts

DACL and IACL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

DACL
REX Defensive Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY
IACL
GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY
Issuer REX GraniteShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Pays not established not established
Payout rate, annualized 6.6% 5.0%
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.55%
Cash paid, 1 year 0.6% (since launch on Aug 13, 2026) 0.4% (since launch on Aug 18, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −0.1% +0.7%
Total return, 1 year +0.5% (since launch on Aug 13, 2026) +1.1% (since launch on Aug 18, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year −1.7% −0.4%
Ahead or behind +2.2 pts +1.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 99%
Age 48 days 43 days
Net assets $4m $3m

DACL and IACL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

DACL in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 13, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, DACL paid 0.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned −1.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.2 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.6%, paid periodically.

IACL in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 18, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, IACL paid 0.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned −0.4% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.0%, paid periodically. GraniteShares estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, DACL or IACL?
DACL charges 0.65% a year and IACL charges 0.55%, so IACL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, DACL against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dacl-vs-iacl

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.