ACYQ vs MRA: which paid, and which earned it?

ACYQ and MRA both write options for income. FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF.

1.9%
ACYQ cash paid, since launch
13.7%
MRA cash paid, since launch
+8.0%
ACYQ total return, since launch
+4.6%
MRA total return, since launch
ACYQ · since launch to Sep 30, 20263.7 pts ahead of SPY
ACYQ
+8.0%
SPY
+4.3%

3.7 pts ahead of SPY

ACYQ since launch: paid 1.9%, price +6.0%, total +8.0%, SPY +4.3%, +3.7 pts.

SPY

+4.3%

ACYQ

+8.0%

3.7 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.7 pts ahead of SPY

ACYQ since launch: paid 1.9%, price +6.0%, total +8.0%, SPY +4.3%, +3.7 pts.

SPY

+4.3%

ACYQ

+8.0%

3.7 pts ahead of SPY

1.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACYQ since launch: paid 1.9%, price +6.0%, total +8.0%, SPY +4.3%, +3.7 pts.

MRA · since launch to Sep 30, 202625.5 pts ahead of MARA
MRA
+4.6%
MARA
−20.9%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

MARA

−20.9%

MRA

+4.6%

13.7% cash

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

Total return, distributions reinvested

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

MARA

−20.9%

MRA

+4.6%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

13.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +8.0%. MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACYQMRAACYQMRAACYQMRA
3 months+6.0%+7.2%1.8%7.5%+3.5 pts+22.4 pts
Since launch
ACYQ Jun 2026 · MRA May 2026
+8.0%+4.6%1.9%13.7%+3.7 pts+25.5 pts

ACYQ and MRA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACYQ
FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY
MRA
GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF · Autocallable on MARA, paying monthly
Issuer First Trust GraniteShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy MARA (MARA)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 21.0% 45.3%
Expense ratio 0.75% 1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year 1.9% (since launch on Jun 24, 2026) 13.7% (since launch on May 27, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +6.0% −10.4%
Total return, 1 year +8.0% (since launch on Jun 24, 2026) +4.6% (since launch on May 27, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +4.3% −20.9%
Ahead or behind +3.7 pts +25.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published
Age 98 days 126 days
Net assets $78m $1m

ACYQ and MRA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACYQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jun 24, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACYQ paid 1.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +4.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.7 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 21.0%, paid periodically.

MRA in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 27, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, MRA paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.6%. MARA (MARA) returned −20.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 25.5 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 45.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACYQ or MRA?
ACYQ charges 0.75% a year and MRA charges 1.07%, so ACYQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACYQ against MRA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyq-vs-mra

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.