Which is cheaper, ACBH or MPIM?

ACBH charges 0.60% a year and MPIM charges 0.70%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share on X Download as PDF

ACBH vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap

+4.1 pts

1 month to Nov 12, 2026: ACBH ahead, total return

Fee gap

0.10 pts

A year: ACBH 0.60%, MPIM 0.70%, per filings dated Aug 7, 2026 and Aug 24, 2026

Overlap

–

No book read for both funds

Net flow

–

Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

ACBH costs 0.10 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ACBH vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	ACBH	MPIM
Paid and earned
Measure	ACBH	MPIM
Price change	fell 3.5% (since Sep 10, 2026)	fell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)
Against its benchmark
Measure	ACBH	MPIM
Benchmark	S&P 500, measured through SPY	not published
Cost and size
Measure	ACBH	MPIM
Expense ratio	0.60%	0.70%
Net assets	$3.6m	not read by ETFIQ
Holdings
Measure	ACBH	MPIM
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Key numbers

2.0%

ACBH cash paid, since launch, Sep 10, 2026

3.0%

MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026

−1.5%

ACBH total return, since launch, Sep 10, 2026

−10.0%

MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026

ACBH · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 1.7 pts behind SPY

ACBH

−1.5%

SPY

+0.2%

1.7 pts behind SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 2.0%, price −3.5%, total −1.5%, SPY +0.2%, −1.7 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+0.2%

ACBH

−1.5%

1.7 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.7 pts behind SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 2.0%, price −3.5%, total −1.5%, SPY +0.2%, −1.7 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+0.2%

ACBH

−1.5%

1.7 pts behind SPY

2.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBH since launch: paid 2.0%, price −3.5%, total −1.5%, SPY +0.2%, −1.7 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured

MPIM

−10.0%

none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

ACBH Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable

Issuer Pacer m+

Strategy autocallable autocallable

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) not set

Pays not established not established

Payout rate, annualized 14.8% 17.0%

Expense ratio 0.60% 0.70%

Cash paid, 1 year 2.0% (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)

Price change, 1 year −3.5% (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)

Total return, 1 year −1.5% (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)

Benchmark return, 1 year +0.2% (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) not published

Ahead or behind −1.7 pts (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) not available

Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published

Age 63 days 92 days

Net assets $3.6m not read by ETFIQ

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: ACBH vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	ACBH	MPIM	ACBH	MPIM	ACBH	MPIM
3 months	–	−10.6%	–	3.0%	–	not measured
Since launchNot the same days: ACBH Sep 2026 · MPIM Aug 2026	−1.5%	−10.0%	2.0%	3.0%	−1.7 pts	not measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

ACBH

Over the period from its first trade on Sep 10, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ACBH paid 2.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +0.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.7 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.8%, paid periodically.

MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACBH or MPIM?: ACBH charges 0.60% a year and MPIM charges 0.70%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ACBH vs ANV ACBH vs ARKY ACBH vs ATC ACBH vs ATCL MPIM vs SPUT MPIM vs JULH MPIM vs DRKY MPIM vs SCLZ

Where to next

S&P 500 (SPY) →All income ETFs ranked by the Distribution Coverage Score →How the scores are computed →ACBH on its own →MPIM on its own →ACBH dividend history →MPIM dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

ACBH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

ACBH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Pacer website ↗

MPIM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

MPIM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACBH against MPIM, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-mpim

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

ACBH and MPIM both write options for income.

ACBH on its own →MPIM on its own →

Growth of 100

ACBH and MPIM

Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 month.

ACBH −5.3%MPIM −9.4%

Oct 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

ACBH −5.3%, MPIM −9.4%: ACBH +4.1 pts ahead, 1 month, Oct 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.