Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

MPIM vs SCLZ: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+10.4 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: SCLZ ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.09 pts
A year: MPIM 0.70%, SCLZ 0.79%, per filings dated Aug 7, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

MPIM costs 0.09 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

MPIM vs SCLZ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureMPIMSCLZ
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 yearnot published+9.8%
Price changefell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)rose 0.9% (1 year)
Against its benchmark
Benchmarknot publishedS&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.70%0.79%
Net assetsnot read by ETFIQ$20m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
3.0%
MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
8.4%
SCLZ cash paid, 1 year
−10.0%
MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
+9.8%
SCLZ total return, 1 year
MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPIM
−10.0%
none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
SCLZ · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 2.2 pts behind SPY
SCLZ
+9.8%
SPY
+12.0%

2.2 pts behind SPY

SCLZ over 1 year: paid 8.4%, price +0.9%, total +9.8%, SPY +12.0%, −2.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+12.0%

SCLZ

+9.8%

8.4% of it arrived as cash

2.2 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.2 pts behind SPY

SCLZ over 1 year: paid 8.4%, price +0.9%, total +9.8%, SPY +12.0%, −2.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+12.0%

SCLZ

+9.8%

2.2 pts behind SPY

8.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SCLZ over 1 year: paid 8.4%, price +0.9%, total +9.8%, SPY +12.0%, −2.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF · Dividend stocks with call overlay on SPY, paying monthly
Issuer m+ Swan
Strategy autocallable dividend stocks with call overlay
Benchmark not set S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 17.0% 8.7%
Expense ratio 0.70% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) 8.4%
Price change, 1 year −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) +0.9%
Total return, 1 year −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) +9.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year not published +12.0%
Ahead or behind not available −2.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published
Age 92 days 2.7 years
Net assets not read by ETFIQ $20m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: MPIM vs SCLZ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowMPIMSCLZMPIMSCLZMPIMSCLZ
3 months−10.6%−0.2%3.0%2.1%not measured+2.2 pts
6 months–+3.7%–4.3%–+2.0 pts
1 year–+9.8%–8.4%–−2.2 pts
Since launchNot the same days: MPIM Aug 2026 · SCLZ Feb 2024−10.0%+35.9%3.0%21.2%not measured−18.3 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

SCLZ

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.2 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.7%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, MPIM or SCLZ?
MPIM charges 0.70% a year and SCLZ charges 0.79%, so MPIM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MPIM against SCLZ, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mpim-vs-sclz

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

MPIM and SCLZ both write options for income.

Growth of 100

MPIM and SCLZ

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

MPIM −10.6%SCLZ −0.2%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

MPIM −10.6%, SCLZ −0.2%: SCLZ +10.4 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.