Which is cheaper, QQDH or SCLZ?

QQDH charges 0.95% a year and SCLZ charges 0.79%, so SCLZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 30, 2026.

Income ETFs

QQDH vs SCLZ: Dividend Yield & Total Return

QQDH and SCLZ both write options for income.

askIQ about this page

Net assets: $20m on Jun 30, 2026 for Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF, beside Tuttle Capital Innovation 100 Income AND Hedge ETF.

QQDH on its own →SCLZ on its own →

At a glance

0.3%

QQDH cash paid, since launch, Oct 23, 2026

8.4%

SCLZ cash paid, 1 year

−2.6%

QQDH total return, since launch, Oct 23, 2026

+9.7%

SCLZ total return, 1 year

QQDH · since launch to Oct 30, 2026 Not measured

QQDH

−2.6%

none

Not measured

QQDH since launch: paid 0.3%, price −2.9%, total −2.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Oct 30, 2026.

QQDH

−2.6%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

QQDH since launch: paid 0.3%, price −2.9%, total −2.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Oct 30, 2026.

QQDH

−2.6%

0.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. QQDH since launch: paid 0.3%, price −2.9%, total −2.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Oct 30, 2026.

Data to Oct 30, 2026.

SCLZ · 1 year to Oct 30, 2026 2.7 pts behind SPY

SCLZ

+9.7%

SPY

+12.4%

2.7 pts behind SPY

SCLZ over 1 year: paid 8.4%, price +0.8%, total +9.7%, SPY +12.4%, −2.7 pts. Data to Oct 30, 2026.

SPY

+12.4%

SCLZ

+9.7%

8.4% of it arrived as cash

2.7 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.7 pts behind SPY

SCLZ over 1 year: paid 8.4%, price +0.8%, total +9.7%, SPY +12.4%, −2.7 pts. Data to Oct 30, 2026.

SPY

+12.4%

SCLZ

+9.7%

8.4% cash

2.7 pts behind SPY

8.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SCLZ over 1 year: paid 8.4%, price +0.8%, total +9.7%, SPY +12.4%, −2.7 pts. Data to Oct 30, 2026.

Data to Oct 30, 2026.

Pair scorecard

SCLZ costs 0.16 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

QQDH vs SCLZ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	QQDH	SCLZ
Paid and earned
Measure	QQDH	SCLZ
Total return, 1 year	not published	+9.7%
Price change	fell 2.9% (since Oct 23, 2026)	rose 0.8% (1 year)
Against its benchmark
Measure	QQDH	SCLZ
Benchmark	not published	S&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Measure	QQDH	SCLZ
Expense ratio	0.95%	0.79%
Net assets	not read by ETFIQ	$20m
Holdings
Measure	QQDH	SCLZ
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Side by side

QQDH Tuttle Capital Innovation 100 Income AND Hedge ETF · 0DTE covered call SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF · Dividend stocks with call overlay on SPY, paying monthly

Issuer Tuttle Swan

Strategy 0DTE covered call dividend stocks with call overlay

Benchmark none S&P 500 (SPY)

Pays not established monthly

Payout rate, annualized 3.9% 8.8%

Expense ratio 0.95% 0.79%

Cash paid, 1 year 0.3% (since launch, Oct 23, 2026) 8.4%

Price change, 1 year −2.9% (since launch, Oct 23, 2026) +0.8%

Total return, 1 year −2.6% (since launch, Oct 23, 2026) +9.7%

Benchmark return, 1 year not published +12.4%

Ahead or behind not available −2.7 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published

Age 7 days 2.7 years

Net assets not read by ETFIQ $20m

As of Oct 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: QQDH vs SCLZ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	QQDH	SCLZ	QQDH	SCLZ	QQDH	SCLZ
3 months	–	+2.1%	–	2.2%	–	+0.7 pts
6 months	–	+4.7%	–	4.3%	–	−0.7 pts
1 year	–	+9.7%	–	8.4%	–	−2.7 pts
Since launchNot the same days: QQDH Oct 2026 · SCLZ Feb 2024	−2.6%	+34.9%	0.3%	21.2%	not measured	−19.1 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

QQDH

Over the period from its first trade on Oct 23, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026, QQDH paid 0.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.6%. At its price on Oct 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 3.9%, paid periodically.

SCLZ

Over the year to Oct 30, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +12.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.7 pts. At its price on Oct 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, QQDH or SCLZ?: QQDH charges 0.95% a year and SCLZ charges 0.79%, so SCLZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

QQDH vs QUSA QQDH vs DRKY QQDH vs SPUT QQDH vs APRH SCLZ vs VOOY SCLZ vs ACKY SCLZ vs CDPI SCLZ vs DDDD

Where to next

S&P 500 (SPY) →All income ETFs ranked by the Distribution Coverage Score →How the scores are computed →QQDH on its own →SCLZ on its own →QQDH dividend history →SCLZ dividend history →SCLZ holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

QQDH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

QQDH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Tuttle website ↗

SCLZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SCLZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Swan website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QQDH against SCLZ, data as of Oct 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qqdh-vs-sclz

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.