Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

JULH vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+11.4 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: JULH ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.09 pts
A year: JULH 0.79%, MPIM 0.70%, per filings dated Jul 1, 2026 and Aug 7, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

MPIM costs 0.09 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

JULH vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureJULHMPIM
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+4.1%not published
Price changefell 0.8% (1 year)fell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)
Return of capital, issuer estimate51% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYnot published
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%0.70%
Net assets$18mnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
4.8%
JULH cash paid, 1 year
3.0%
MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
+4.1%
JULH total return, 1 year
−10.0%
MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
JULH · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 7.9 pts behind SPY
JULH
+4.1%
SPY
+12.0%

7.9 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.8%, total +4.1%, SPY +12.0%, −7.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+12.0%

JULH

+4.1%

4.8% as cash

7.9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

7.9 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.8%, total +4.1%, SPY +12.0%, −7.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+12.0%

JULH

+4.1%

7.9 pts behind SPY

4.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.8%, total +4.1%, SPY +12.0%, −7.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPIM
−10.0%
none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

JULH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable
Issuer Innovator m+
Strategy defined income autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) not set
Pays quarterly not established
Payout rate, annualized 6.6% 17.0%
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.70%
Cash paid, 1 year 4.8% 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −0.8% −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Total return, 1 year +4.1% −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +12.0% not published
Ahead or behind −7.9 pts not available
Return of capital, latest estimate 51% not published
Age 3.4 years 92 days
Net assets $18m not read by ETFIQ

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: JULH vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowJULHMPIMJULHMPIMJULHMPIM
3 months+0.8%−10.6%1.6%3.0%+3.2 ptsnot measured
6 months+2.7%–2.7%–+1.0 pts–
1 year+4.1%–4.8%–−7.9 pts–
3 years+19.8%–18.3%–−58.5 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: JULH Jul 2023 · MPIM Aug 2026+23.2%−10.0%20.3%3.0%−54.3 ptsnot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

JULH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
JULH

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.9 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.6%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 51% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, JULH or MPIM?
JULH charges 0.79% a year and MPIM charges 0.70%, so MPIM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JULH against MPIM, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-mpim

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

JULH and MPIM both write options for income.

Growth of 100

JULH and MPIM

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

JULH +0.8%MPIM −10.6%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

JULH +0.8%, MPIM −10.6%: JULH +11.4 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.