Data as of .
JULH vs KNG: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year KNG paid 8.5% of its price in cash against JULH’s 4.7%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: KNG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JULH and KNG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in JULH | Only in KNG |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 100.00% | Johnson & Johnson 1.85% |
| Nucor Corporation 1.85% | |
| West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 1.77% | |
| Chubb Limited 1.74% | |
| Becton, Dickinson and Company 1.72% | |
| The Procter & Gamble Company 1.72% | |
| Archer-Daniels-Midland Company 1.71% | |
| Walmart Inc. 1.71% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JULH | KNG | JULH | KNG | JULH | KNG | |
| 3 months | +1.8% | +1.8% | 1.1% | 2.2% | −0.4 pts | −0.1 pts |
| 6 months | +4.0% | +7.1% | 2.7% | 4.4% | −14.0 pts | −0.9 pts |
| 1 year | +4.5% | +8.3% | 4.7% | 8.5% | −12.1 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 3 years | +20.7% | +24.0% | 18.4% | 25.4% | −57.7 pts | −4.3 pts |
| Since launch | +22.7% | +101.5% | 18.6% | 59.4% | −55.9 pts | −15.2 pts |
| JULH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly | KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on NOBL, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Innovator | First Trust |
| Strategy | defined income | dividend stocks with call overlay |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (NOBL) |
| Pays | quarterly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 4.2% | 8.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.74% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 4.7% | 8.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.4% | −0.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.5% | +8.3% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +9.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −12.1 pts | −1.6 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1173 days | 3097 days |
| Net assets | $17m | $3.3bn |
JULH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULH paid 4.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.2%, paid quarterly.
KNG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, KNG paid 8.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.3%. S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (NOBL) returned +9.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, JULH or KNG?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULH paid 4.7% of its starting price in cash and KNG paid 8.5%, so KNG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, JULH or KNG?
- With every distribution reinvested, JULH returned +4.5% and KNG returned +8.3% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so KNG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, JULH or KNG?
- JULH charges 0.79% a year and KNG charges 0.74%, so KNG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, JULH against KNG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-kng Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.