THRO vs VV: Differences, Returns & Fees
THRO and VV hold 65% of their weight in the same names, and THRO returned +18.3% over the year. Net assets: $7.5bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF, and $54.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF.
VV costs 0.54 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.2 points; VV is 7.9 times larger.
| THRO | VV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $6.8bn | $54.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.3% | +17.1% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | CRSP US Large Cap Index |
| Holdings in common | 65% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 43.5% | 38.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, THRO and VV hold 65% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
65% in common
On the same fields
THRO and VV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About THRO
THRO is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 247 positions, with the top ten at 43.5%.
About VV
VV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Aug 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 434 positions, with the top ten at 38.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, THRO or VV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, THRO returned +18.3% and VV +17.1%.
- Which is cheaper, THRO or VV?
- VV is cheaper, by 0.54 percentage points a year. That is about $54 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, THRO against VV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/thro-vs-vv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). THRO against VV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/thro-vs-vv
[THRO against VV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/thro-vs-vv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.