RDVY vs VV: Differences, Returns & Fees
RDVY and VV hold 26% of their weight in the same names, and RDVY returned +20.2% over the year. Net assets: $25.5bn on Oct 9, 2026 for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF, and $54.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF.
VV costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.1 points; VV is 3.0 times larger.
| RDVY | VV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $24.5bn | $73.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.2% | +17.1% |
| What it tracks | Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index | CRSP US Large Cap Index |
| Holdings in common | 26% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 23.2% | 38.2% |
| Below its high | 4.9%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, RDVY and VV hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
26% in common
On the same fields
RDVY and VV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About RDVY
RDVY tracks an index of Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 72 positions, with the top ten at 23.2%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
About VV
VV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Aug 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 434 positions, with the top ten at 38.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, RDVY or VV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RDVY returned +20.2% and VV +17.1%.
- Which is cheaper, RDVY or VV?
- VV is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, RDVY against VV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rdvy-vs-vv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). RDVY against VV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rdvy-vs-vv
[RDVY against VV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rdvy-vs-vv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.