QDPL vs VV: Differences, Returns & Fees

QDPL and VV hold 88% of their weight in the same names, and VV returned +17.1% over the year. Net assets: $1.8bn on Oct 2, 2026 for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF, and $54.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF.

VV costs 0.57 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.8 points.

QDPL vs VV: Differences, Returns & Fees
QDPLVV
Expense ratio0.60%0.03%
Net assets, QDPL as of Oct 2, 2026 and VV as of Sep 30, 2026$1.8bn$54.1bn
Total return, 1 year+16.3%+17.1%
What it tracksMetaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index Series 400CRSP US Large Cap Index
Holdings in common88%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund34.2%38.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

+16.3%
QDPL total return, 1 year
+17.1%
VV total return, 1 year
0.60%
QDPL expense ratio
0.03%
VV expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QDPL and VV hold 88% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

half

88% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding QDPL VV
NVIDIA Corp 6.87% 7.84%
Apple Inc 6.41% 7.19%
Microsoft Corp 4.88% 5.82%
Amazon.com Inc 3.75% 3.88%
Alphabet Inc 2.95% 3.08%
Broadcom Inc 2.60% 2.71%
Alphabet Inc 2.38% 2.42%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.73% 1.94%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.33% 1.47%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.32% 1.37%
Micron Technology Inc 1.31% 1.67%
Eli Lilly & Co 1.28% 1.51%
Only in QDPL
US TREASURY N/B 0.88%
US TREASURY N/B 0.85%
US TREASURY N/B 0.83%
US TREASURY N/B 0.82%
US TREASURY N/B 0.82%
US TREASURY N/B 0.82%
US TREASURY N/B 0.81%
US TREASURY N/B 0.81%
Only in VV
Snowflake Inc 0.17%
Cloudflare Inc 0.15%
MKTLIQ 0.14%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 0.13%
Cheniere Energy Inc 0.09%
Bloom Energy Corp 0.09%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 0.07%
Strategy Inc 0.07%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
VV
Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +16.3% +17.1%
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 89.9% 98.0%
Holdings 513 434
Net assets, QDPL as of Oct 2, 2026 and VV as of Sep 30, 2026 $1.8bn $54.1bn

QDPL and VV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About QDPL

QDPL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 513 positions, with the top ten at 34.2%.

About VV

VV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Aug 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 434 positions, with the top ten at 38.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QDPL or VV?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QDPL returned +16.3% and VV +17.1%.
Which is cheaper, QDPL or VV?
VV is cheaper, by 0.57 percentage points a year. That is about $57 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QDPL and VV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of QDPL and 98% of VV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QDPL against VV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qdpl-vs-vv

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.