PWV vs RWL: Differences, Returns & Fees
PWV and RWL hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and PWV returned +22.5% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1.8bn for Invesco Large Cap Value ETF and $10.0bn for Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF.
RWL costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.4 points; RWL is 5.5 times larger.
| PWV | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.55% | 0.39% |
| Net assets | $1.8bn | $10.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.5% | +21.1% |
| What it tracks | Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index | S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index |
| Holdings in common | 27% | |
| Holdings dated | Oct 10, 2026 | Oct 10, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.8% | 24.0% |
| Below its high | 6.5%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PWV and RWL hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
half
27% in common
On the same fields
PWV and RWL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About PWV
PWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 33.8%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
About RWL
RWL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +21.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 24.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PWV or RWL?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PWV returned +22.5% and RWL +21.1%.
- Which is cheaper, PWV or RWL?
- RWL is cheaper, by 0.16 percentage points a year. That is about $16 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PWV against RWL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwv-vs-rwl
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). PWV against RWL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwv-vs-rwl
[PWV against RWL (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwv-vs-rwl)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.