Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PULS vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to QQQM's +15.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PULS and QQQM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and $110.4bn for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

At a glance
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
0.15%
PULS expense ratio
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.15% a year; their one-year returns differ by 11.2 points; QQQM is 5.6 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

PULS vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePULSQQQM
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.0%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNasdaq-100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$19.8bn$110.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight96%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PULS and QQQM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PULS QQQM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Only in QQQM
NVIDIA Corp 8.17%
Apple Inc 7.88%
Microsoft Corp 6.14%
Micron Technology Inc 4.50%
Amazon.com Inc 4.25%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.93%
Tesla Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 2.93%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PGIM Invesco
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +4.0% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +15.2% (QQQ)
Gap to its benchmark not measured 0.0 pts vs QQQ
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.15%
Holdings 553 105
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $19.8bn $110.4bn

PULS and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PULS and QQQM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or QQQM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and QQQM +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, PULS or QQQM?
Neither: PULS and QQQM both charge 0.15% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PULS against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-qqqm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.