Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PULS vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to SCHG's +6.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PULS and SCHG
Net assets: $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHG costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.8 points.
| Measure | PULS | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.0% | +6.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 | $19.8bn | $63.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 95% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 51.0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PULS and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PULS and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PULS or SCHG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and SCHG +6.8%.
- Which is cheaper, PULS or SCHG?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PULS against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-schg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PULS against SCHG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-schg
[PULS against SCHG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-schg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.