Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PULS vs QQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to QQQ's +15.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PULS and QQQ

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and $483.0bn for Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1.

At a glance
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQ total return, 1 year
0.15%
PULS expense ratio
0.18%
QQQ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

PULS costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.2 points; QQQ is far larger, $483.0bn against $19.8bn.

PULS vs QQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePULSQQQ
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.0%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNasdaq-100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.18%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$19.8bn$483.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight96%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PULS and QQQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PULS QQQ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Only in QQQ
NVIDIA Corp 8.17%
Apple Inc 7.88%
Microsoft Corp 6.14%
Micron Technology Inc 4.50%
Amazon.com Inc 4.25%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.93%
Tesla Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 2.92%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PGIM Invesco
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +4.0% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +15.2% (QQQM)
Gap to its benchmark not measured 0.0 pts vs QQQM
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.18%
Holdings 553 103
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $19.8bn $483.0bn

PULS and QQQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PULS and QQQ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

QQQ

QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or QQQ?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and QQQ +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, PULS or QQQ?
PULS is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PULS against QQQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-qqq

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.