Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWF vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWF returned +0.9% to PULS's +4.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWF and PULS
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $124.7bn for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
PULS costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.1 points; IWF is 6.3 times larger.
| Measure | IWF | PULS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.9% | +4.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Growth Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $124.7bn | $19.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 94% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.5% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWF and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or PULS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +0.9% and PULS +4.0%.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or PULS?
- PULS is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWF against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-puls
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWF against PULS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-puls
[IWF against PULS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-puls)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.