Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PULS vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to VONG's +1.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PULS and VONG

Net assets: $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF, and $47.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
+1.1%
VONG total return, 1 year
0.15%
PULS expense ratio
0.06%
VONG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VONG costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.9 points.

PULS vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePULSVONG
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.0%+1.1%
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.06%
Net assets, PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026$19.8bn$47.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight96%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PULS and VONG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PULS VONG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Only in VONG
NVIDIA Corp 15.63%
Apple Inc 7.65%
Alphabet Inc 5.88%
Microsoft Corp 5.59%
Broadcom Inc 4.79%
Alphabet Inc 4.75%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.83%
Micron Technology Inc 3.52%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PGIM Vanguard
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Russell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year +4.0% +1.1%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +0.9% (IWF)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.2 pts vs IWF
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.06%
Holdings 553 373
Net assets, PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026 $19.8bn $47.1bn

PULS and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PULS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

VONG

VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or VONG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and VONG +1.1%.
Which is cheaper, PULS or VONG?
VONG is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PULS against VONG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-vong

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.