Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
PULS vs SPYG: how they differ
PULS and SPYG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SPYG returned more over the year.
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PULS and SPYG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in PULS | Only in SPYG |
|---|---|
| PGIM ETF Trust 2.38% | NVIDIA CORP 14.85% |
| GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98% | MICROSOFT CORP 10.27% |
| Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87% | APPLE INC 6.73% |
| ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75% | ALPHABET INC CL A 5.47% |
| BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68% | BROADCOM INC 4.80% |
| FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67% | ALPHABET INC CL C 4.38% |
| BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56% | META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 3.97% |
| BROADCOM INC 0.56% | AMAZON.COM INC 3.67% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | SPYG State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | PGIM | State Street |
| What it is | PGIM Ultra Short Bond | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.2% | +17.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −13.3 pts | +0.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | 553 | 150 |
PULS in plain words
PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
SPYG in plain words
SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 59.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PULS or SPYG?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.2% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, PULS or SPYG?
- PULS charges 0.15% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, PULS against SPYG, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-spyg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources