Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BIL vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BIL returned +3.7% to VONG's +1.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BIL and VONG
Net assets: $48.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF, and $47.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
VONG costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.6 points; BIL is 1.1 times larger.
| Measure | BIL | VONG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +3.7% | +1.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index | Russell 1000 Growth Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $49.8bn | $47.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 96% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 838 weekly returnsVONG returned more: +1,017.5% to +25.5%. BIL swung less: 0.3% to 17.9%. BIL fell less at its worst: −0.4% to −32.5%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BIL | VONG | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +25.5% | +1,017.5% | VONG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +1.4% | +16.2% | VONG | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −0.1% | +840.0% | VONG | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 0.3% | 17.9% | BIL | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 0.2% | 12.0% | BIL | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −0.4% | −32.5% | BIL | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | −0.67 | 0.84 | VONG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | −0.98 | 1.25 | VONG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 3.29 | 0.50 | BIL | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 838 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BIL and VONG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BIL and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BIL and VONG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. BIL follows Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index and VONG follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BIL returned +3.7% and VONG +1.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.6 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BIL
BIL tracks an index of 1-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
VONG
VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BIL or VONG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and VONG +1.1%.
- Which is cheaper, BIL or VONG?
- VONG is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BIL against VONG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-vong
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BIL against VONG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-vong
[BIL against VONG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-vong)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.