Which returned more over the last year, QQQM or VUSB?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQM returned +23.0% and VUSB returned +3.7%, so QQQM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, QQQM or VUSB?

QQQM charges 0.15% a year and VUSB charges 0.10%, so VUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QQQM vs VUSB: how they differ

QQQM and VUSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and QQQM returned more over the year.

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF and Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQM and VUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQM	Only in VUSB
NVIDIA Corp 8.52%	United States Treasury Bill 4.24%
Apple Inc 7.72%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.68%
Microsoft Corp 5.89%	PNC Financial Services Group Inc/The 0.59%
Micron Technology Inc 4.90%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.53%
Amazon.com Inc 4.36%	Regions Bank/Birmingham AL 0.52%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.65%	US Bancorp 0.51%
Alphabet Inc 3.12%	Charles Schwab Corp/The 0.50%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.07%	Truist Bank 0.45%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

QQQM and VUSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Invesco	Vanguard
What it is	Nasdaq-100	Ultra-Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	+23.0%	+3.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5.5 pts	−13.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.10%
Holdings	106	1281

QQQM in plain words

QQQM is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 106 positions, with the top ten at 47.1%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VUSB in plain words

VUSB is a cash and treasury bills tracking the Ultra-Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQM or VUSB?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQM returned +23.0% and VUSB returned +3.7%, so QQQM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQM or VUSB?: QQQM charges 0.15% a year and VUSB charges 0.10%, so VUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQM against VUSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQM against VUSB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqqm-vs-vusb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources