Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PDBC vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PDBC returned +55.6% to PULS's +4.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PDBC and PULS
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $8.0bn for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
PULS costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 51.6 points; PULS is 2.5 times larger.
| Measure | PDBC | PULS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +55.6% | +4.0% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $8.0bn | $19.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PDBC and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PDBC
PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or PULS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.6% and PULS +4.0%.
- Which is cheaper, PDBC or PULS?
- PULS is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PDBC against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-puls
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PDBC against PULS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-puls
[PDBC against PULS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-puls)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.