Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

HGER vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, HGER returned +46.9% to PULS's +4.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about HGER and PULS

Net assets: $5.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF, and $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

At a glance
+46.9%
HGER total return, 1 year
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
0.68%
HGER expense ratio
0.15%
PULS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

PULS costs 0.53 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 42.9 points; PULS is 4.0 times larger.

HGER vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureHGERPULS
Return
Total return, 1 year+46.9%+4.0%
Benchmark
What it tracksQuantix Commodity IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.68%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$5.0bn$19.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, HGER and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first HGER PULS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in HGER
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Harbor PGIM
What it is Tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +46.9% +4.0%
Expense ratio 0.68% 0.15%
Holdings 0 553
Net assets, HGER as of Oct 28, 2026 and PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.0bn $19.8bn

HGER and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

HGER and PULS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
HGER

HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +46.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 0 positions, with the top ten at not published.

PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HGER or PULS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HGER returned +46.9% and PULS +4.0%.
Which is cheaper, HGER or PULS?
PULS is cheaper, by 0.53 percentage points a year. That is about $53 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HGER against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hger-vs-puls

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.