Which returned more over the last year, PULS or SIVR?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.2% and SIVR returned +54.2%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, PULS or SIVR?

PULS charges 0.15% a year and SIVR charges 0.45%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

PULS vs SIVR: how they differ

PULS is a short-term Treasury fund and SIVR a commodity fund, and over the year SIVR returned more, +54.2% against +4.2%.

PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF.

PULS and SIVR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PGIM	abrdn
What it is	PGIM Ultra Short Bond	Physical Silver
Total return, 1 year	+4.2%	+54.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−13.3 pts	+36.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.45%
Holdings	553	not filed

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

SIVR in plain words

SIVR is a commodity fund tracking the Physical Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +54.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. It sat 44.9% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or SIVR?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.2% and SIVR returned +54.2%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, PULS or SIVR?: PULS charges 0.15% a year and SIVR charges 0.45%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PULS against SIVR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PULS against SIVR, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-sivr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources