Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MINT vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MINT and PDBC
Net assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.
Pair scorecard
MINT costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 51.4 points.
| Measure | MINT | PDBC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.2% | +55.6% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 | $16.4bn | $8.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 14, 2014 to Oct 23, 2026 · 623 weekly returnsPDBC returned more: +85.7% to +34.4%. MINT swung less: 1.3% to 18.0%. MINT fell less at its worst: −4.6% to −48.3%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | MINT | PDBC | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +34.4% | +85.7% | PDBC | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +2.5% | +5.3% | PDBC | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −0.7% | −17.2% | MINT | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 1.3% | 18.0% | MINT | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 1.1% | 12.3% | MINT | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −4.6% | −48.3% | MINT | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.27 | 0.26 | MINT (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.31 | 0.38 | PDBC | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.54 | 0.11 | MINT | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 623 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MINT and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
MINT and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.
MINT
MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.
PDBC
PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MINT or PDBC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and PDBC +55.6%.
- Which is cheaper, MINT or PDBC?
- MINT is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MINT against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-pdbc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MINT against PDBC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-pdbc
[MINT against PDBC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-pdbc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.