Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BWET vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
BWET is a commodity futures fund and MINT an actively managed short-term fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against +4.2%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BWET and MINT
Net assets: $178m on Oct 28, 2026 for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF, and $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.
Pair scorecard
MINT costs 4.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5117.5 points.
| Measure | BWET | MINT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +5,121.7% | +4.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 11.2%, high on Oct 8, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Tanker freight futures | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 4.68% | 0.36% |
| Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 | $178m | $16.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Risk and return
May 12, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 180 weekly returnsBWET returned more: +5,753.7% to +19.3%. MINT swung less: 0.3% to 87.4%. MINT fell less at its worst: −0.1% to −55.9%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BWET | MINT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +5,753.7% | +19.3% | BWET | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +224.0% | +5.2% | BWET | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +5,753.7% | +1.3% | BWET | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 87.4% | 0.3% | MINT | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 40.2% | 0.2% | MINT | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −55.9% | −0.1% | MINT | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 1.71 | 1.94 | MINT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 3.72 | 3.02 | BWET | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 4.01 | Not measured | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 180 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
BWET and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for BWET.
Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.
BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
MINT
MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BWET or MINT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and MINT +4.2%.
- Which is cheaper, BWET or MINT?
- MINT is cheaper, by 4.32 percentage points a year. That is about $432 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BWET against MINT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-mint
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BWET against MINT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-mint
[BWET against MINT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-mint)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.