Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BWET vs USFR: Differences, Returns & Fees
BWET is a commodity futures fund and USFR a bond index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against +4.1%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BWET and USFR
Net assets: $178m on Oct 28, 2026 for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF, and $17.0bn on May 31, 2026 for WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund.
Pair scorecard
USFR costs 4.53 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5117.6 points.
| Measure | BWET | USFR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +5,121.7% | +4.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 11.2%, high on Oct 8, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Tanker freight futures | Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 4.68% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and USFR as of May 31, 2026 | $178m | $17.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Risk and return
May 12, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 180 weekly returnsBWET returned more: +5,753.7% to +17.1%. USFR swung less: 0.2% to 87.4%. USFR fell less at its worst: 0.0% to −55.9%.
Full scorecard
8 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BWET | USFR | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +5,753.7% | +17.1% | BWET | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +224.0% | +4.7% | BWET | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +5,753.7% | +0.2% | BWET | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 87.4% | 0.2% | USFR | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 40.2% | 0.1% | USFR | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −55.9% | 0.0% | USFR | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 1.71 | −0.03 | BWET | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 3.72 | −0.04 | BWET | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 180 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
BWET and USFR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for BWET.
Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.
BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
USFR
USFR tracks an index of Floating Rate Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BWET or USFR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and USFR +4.1%.
- Which is cheaper, BWET or USFR?
- USFR is cheaper, by 4.53 percentage points a year. That is about $453 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BWET against USFR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-usfr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BWET against USFR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-usfr
[BWET against USFR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-usfr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.