Which returned more over the last year, BWET or VBIL?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and VBIL returned +3.8%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BWET or VBIL?

BWET charges 0.15% a year and VBIL charges 0.06%, so VBIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BWET vs VBIL: how they differ

BWET is a commodity fund and VBIL a short-term Treasury fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +3.8%.

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF.

BWET and VBIL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	VBIL Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Breakwave	Vanguard
What it is	Tanker Shipping	0-3 Month Treasury Bill
Total return, 1 year	+5129.6%	+3.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5112.1 pts	−13.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.06%
Holdings	not filed	26

BWET in plain words

BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

VBIL in plain words

VBIL is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 0-3 Month Treasury Bill. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or VBIL?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and VBIL returned +3.8%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BWET or VBIL?: BWET charges 0.15% a year and VBIL charges 0.06%, so VBIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BWET against VBIL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BWET against VBIL, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-vbil Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources