Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or MINT?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +2.8% and MINT +4.2%.

Which is cheaper, GLDM or MINT?

GLDM is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

GLDM vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

GLDM is a commodity fund and MINT an actively managed short-term fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% against +2.8%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GLDM and MINT

Net assets: $30.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust, and $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.

GLDM on its own →MINT on its own →

At a glance

+2.8%

GLDM total return, 1 year

+4.2%

MINT total return, 1 year

0.10%

GLDM expense ratio

0.36%

MINT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GLDM costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.4 points.

GLDM vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	GLDM	MINT
Return
Measure	GLDM	MINT
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+4.2%
Drawdown
Measure	GLDM	MINT
Below its high	24.5%, high on Jan 29, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	GLDM	MINT
What it tracks	Gold	No index, actively managed
Cost and size
Measure	GLDM	MINT
Expense ratio	0.10%	0.36%
Net assets, GLDM as of Oct 27, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026	$30.6bn	$16.4bn
Holdings
Measure	GLDM	MINT
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Side by side

GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund

Where it sits Commodity ETF Bond ETF

Issuer State Street PIMCO

What it is Holds gold Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +2.8% +4.2%

Its benchmark over the same days +2.5% (GLD) not measured

Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs GLD not measured

Expense ratio 0.10% 0.36%

Holdings not counted 977

Net assets, GLDM as of Oct 27, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 $30.6bn $16.4bn

GLDM and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

GLDM

Its expense ratio is 0.10% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

GLDM holds gold. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +2.5% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.5% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or MINT?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +2.8% and MINT +4.2%.
Which is cheaper, GLDM or MINT?: GLDM is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

GLDM vs USFR GLDM vs PULS GLDM vs VBIL GLDM vs SHV IAU vs MINT MINT vs USO MINT vs SLV MINT vs SIVR

Where to next

GLDM on its own →MINT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →MINT dividend history →MINT holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

State Street website ↗

MINT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

MINT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

PIMCO website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GLDM against MINT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gldm-vs-mint

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.