Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PDBC vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PDBC returned +55.6% to VUSB's +3.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PDBC and VUSB

Net assets: $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF, and $9.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.

At a glance
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
+3.5%
VUSB total return, 1 year
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio
0.10%
VUSB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VUSB costs 0.49 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 52.1 points.

PDBC vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePDBCVUSB
Return
Total return, 1 year+55.6%+3.5%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.10%
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and VUSB as of Sep 30, 2026$8.0bn$9.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and VUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PDBC VUSB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Only in VUSB
United States Treasury Bill 2.39%
United States Treasury Bill 2.35%
MKTLIQ 2.00%
Regions Bank/Birmingham AL 0.89%
PNC Financial Services Group Inc 0.53%
National Bank of Canada 0.53%
Citizens Bank NA/Providence RI 0.48%
US Bancorp 0.47%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +55.6% +3.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +54.6% (DBC) −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark +1.0 pts vs DBC +4.9 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.10%
Holdings 1 1344
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and VUSB as of Sep 30, 2026 $8.0bn $9.9bn

PDBC and VUSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

VUSB

VUSB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.5% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or VUSB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.6% and VUSB +3.5%.
Which is cheaper, PDBC or VUSB?
VUSB is cheaper, by 0.49 percentage points a year. That is about $49 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PDBC against VUSB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-vusb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.