IQ

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PDBC vs SHV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PDBC returned +55.6% to SHV's +3.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PDBC and SHV

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $8.0bn for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and $21.7bn for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

PDBC on its own →SHV on its own →
At a glance
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
+3.6%
SHV total return, 1 year
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio
0.15%
SHV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SHV costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 52.0 points; SHV is 2.7 times larger.

PDBC vs SHV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePDBCSHV
Return
Total return, 1 year+55.6%+3.6%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedICE Short US Treasury Securities Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$8.0bn$21.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and SHV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PDBC SHV
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Only in SHV
TREASURY BILL 4.98%
TREASURY BILL 4.17%
TREASURY BILL 3.90%
TREASURY BILL 3.72%
TREASURY BILL 3.58%
TREASURY BILL 3.48%
TREASURY BILL 3.35%
TREASURY BILL 3.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Invesco iShares
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of 0-1 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year +55.6% +3.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +54.6% (DBC) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +1.0 pts vs DBC not measured
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.15%
Holdings 1 66
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $8.0bn $21.7bn

PDBC and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PDBC and SHV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

SHV

SHV tracks an index of 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or SHV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.6% and SHV +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, PDBC or SHV?
SHV is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
PDBC vs SGOVPDBC vs PULSPDBC vs USFRMINT vs PDBCHGER vs SHVSHV vs USOBWET vs SHVSHV vs SIVR
Where to next
PDBC on its own →SHV on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →PDBC dividend history →PDBC holdings →SHV dividend history →SHV holdings →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
PDBC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
PDBC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Invesco page for PDBC ↗
SHV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
SHV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
iShares page for SHV ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PDBC against SHV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-shv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.