Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PDBC vs USFR: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PDBC returned +55.6% to USFR's +4.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PDBC and USFR

Net assets: $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF, and $17.0bn on May 31, 2026 for WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund.

At a glance
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
+4.1%
USFR total return, 1 year
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio
0.15%
USFR expense ratio

Pair scorecard

USFR costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 51.5 points.

PDBC vs USFR: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePDBCUSFR
Return
Total return, 1 year+55.6%+4.1%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedBloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.15%
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and USFR as of May 31, 2026$8.0bn$17.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and USFR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PDBC USFR
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Only in USFR
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 27.95%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 27.93%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 27.91%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 15.90%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
Where it sits Commodity ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Floating Rate Treasury
Total return, 1 year +55.6% +4.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +54.6% (DBC) +4.0% (TFLO)
Gap to its benchmark +1.0 pts vs DBC +0.1 pts vs TFLO
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.15%
Holdings 1 4
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and USFR as of May 31, 2026 $8.0bn $17.0bn

PDBC and USFR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

USFR

USFR tracks an index of Floating Rate Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or USFR?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.6% and USFR +4.1%.
Which is cheaper, PDBC or USFR?
USFR is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PDBC against USFR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-usfr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.