A
vs
B
Share
Ask IQ about these two funds

OAKM vs SCHV: Differences, Returns & Fees

OAKM and SCHV hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and SCHV returned +19.4% over the year. Net assets: $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF, and $15.5bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF.

SCHV costs 0.55 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.6 points.

OAKMSCHV
Expense ratio0.59%0.04%
Net assets, OAKM as of Jun 30, 2026 and SCHV as of May 31, 2026$1.0bn$15.5bn
Total return, 1 year+14.8%+19.4%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index
Holdings in common8%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund37.0%20.3%
Below its high6.4%, high on Sep 3, 20263.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

+14.8%
OAKM total return, 1 year
+19.4%
SCHV total return, 1 year
0.59%
OAKM expense ratio
0.04%
SCHV expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, OAKM and SCHV hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

half

8% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding OAKM SCHV
Bank of America Corp 3.42% 1.11%
Merck & Co Inc 3.35% 0.96%
Wells Fargo & Co 2.13% 0.78%
Citigroup Inc 4.09% 0.71%
Union Pacific Corp 2.90% 0.51%
Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.93% 0.47%
ConocoPhillips 2.66% 0.45%
Capital One Financial Corp 3.56% 0.38%
Accenture PLC 1.36% 0.37%
Elevance Health Inc 3.38% 0.28%
Intercontinental Exchange Inc 2.82% 0.27%
General Motors Co 2.25% 0.24%
Only in OAKM
Targa Resources Corp 3.77%
Airbnb Inc 3.47%
Salesforce Inc 3.03%
First Citizens BancShares Inc/NC 2.36%
IQVIA Holdings Inc 2.28%
AerCap Holdings NV 2.24%
Equifax Inc 2.01%
Amazon.com Inc 1.62%
Only in SCHV
Micron Technology Inc 3.54%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.82%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.62%
Exxon Mobil Corp 1.97%
Johnson & Johnson 1.76%
Intel Corp 1.75%
Walmart Inc 1.65%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.54%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

OAKM
Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Oakmark Schwab
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +14.8% +19.4%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −2.5 pts +2.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.04%
Already in the S&P 500 91.9% 92.3%
Holdings 39 555
Net assets, OAKM as of Jun 30, 2026 and SCHV as of May 31, 2026 $1.0bn $15.5bn

OAKM and SCHV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

OAKM in plain words

OAKM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 39 positions, with the top ten at 37.0%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

SCHV in plain words

SCHV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 555 positions, with the top ten at 20.3%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, OAKM or SCHV?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, OAKM returned +14.8% and SCHV +19.4%.
Which is cheaper, OAKM or SCHV?
SCHV is cheaper, by 0.55 percentage points a year. That is about $55 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do OAKM and SCHV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of OAKM and 92% of SCHV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
FNDX vs OAKMOAKM vs SCHDDFUV vs OAKMHDV vs OAKMDGRO vs SCHVSCHV vs TVALDUSA vs SCHVFNDB vs SCHV
OAKM on its own →SCHV on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
OAKM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗OAKM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗SCHV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗SCHV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Schwab website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, OAKM against SCHV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oakm-vs-schv

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.