OAKM vs PVAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
OAKM and PVAL hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and PVAL returned +28.6% over the year. Net assets: $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF, and $11.1bn on May 29, 2026 for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF.
PVAL costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.8 points.
| OAKM | PVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.55% |
| Net assets, OAKM as of Jun 30, 2026 and PVAL as of May 29, 2026 | $1.0bn | $11.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.8% | +28.6% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 19% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 37.0% | 35.3% |
| Below its high | 6.4%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OAKM and PVAL hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
19% in common
On the same fields
OAKM and PVAL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
OAKM in plain words
OAKM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 39 positions, with the top ten at 37.0%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
PVAL in plain words
PVAL is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +28.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings filed for May 29, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 45 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, OAKM or PVAL?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, OAKM returned +14.8% and PVAL +28.6%.
- Which is cheaper, OAKM or PVAL?
- PVAL is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, OAKM against PVAL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oakm-vs-pval
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). OAKM against PVAL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oakm-vs-pval
[OAKM against PVAL (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oakm-vs-pval)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.