DFUV vs OAKM: Differences, Returns & Fees
DFUV and OAKM hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and DFUV returned +26.8% over the year. Net assets: $15.4bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF, and $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF.
DFUV costs 0.38 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.0 points.
| DFUV | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.21% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, DFUV as of Jul 31, 2026 and OAKM as of Jun 30, 2026 | $15.4bn | $1.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +26.8% | +14.8% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 10% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 25.9% | 37.0% |
| Below its high | 6.4%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DFUV and OAKM hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
10% in common
On the same fields
DFUV and OAKM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUV in plain words
DFUV is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +26.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 79% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,332 positions, with the top ten at 25.9%.
OAKM in plain words
OAKM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 39 positions, with the top ten at 37.0%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DFUV or OAKM?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUV returned +26.8% and OAKM +14.8%.
- Which is cheaper, DFUV or OAKM?
- DFUV is cheaper, by 0.38 percentage points a year. That is about $38 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DFUV against OAKM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfuv-vs-oakm
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). DFUV against OAKM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfuv-vs-oakm
[DFUV against OAKM (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfuv-vs-oakm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.